Re: Think Progress » The Progressive Case For Passing The Senate Health Bill , By John Podesta on Dec 16th, 2009 at 6:11 pm
Since Joe Lieberman demanded stripping the public option and Medicare buy-in provisions from the merged Senate bill, some strong progressives like Howard Dean have argued that without a public option or a Medicare buy-in provision, the bill is a giveaway to private insurers and should be killed. Other progressive leaders like Senators Jay Rockefeller, Tom Harkin and Sherrod Brown believe that the bill represents the best chance for passing health care reform in the foreseeable future. “I’m going to vote for it,” Brown told reporters. “I can’t imagine I wouldn’t. I mean there’s too much at stake.”
I am sad that Joe Lieberman and Ben Nelson are holding out for their own personal agenda. I wish we had the public option here in the US so the less fortunate can enjoy access to the same health care system. It’s a shame that we cannot provide medical treatment to those who are so poor they have to choose between buying food and paying an insurance premium.
I say lets go ahead and chunk the public option and the Medicare buy-in and then take those issues up later in a separate bill under the reconciliation process. If we pass the current bill that contains more safeguards and consumer protections than ever in the history of health insurance, then we will have accomplished at least a partial victory for the poor and working poor.
Listen to John Podesta, CEO of the Center for American Progress, and former chief of the Obama transition team:
…I come down on the side of the Senate passing the bill.
Here’s why:
The Senate health care bill is not without its problems. But if enacted, it would represent the most significant public reform of our health care system that Congress has passed in the 40 plus years I have worked in politics. The bill will give health care coverage to a record 31 million Americans who are currently uninsured, lay a foundation that will begin to lower costs for millions of families, and provide all Americans with the access to adequate and dependable coverage when they need it most.
All of us are anxious to see the final language from the Senate. And a final bill must ensure that the subsidies provided are sufficient to make insurance truly affordable for working families. But based on what we know, here are my top ten reasons for why progressives should support the Senate passing the bill:
1. Largest Expansion Of Coverage Since Medicare’s Creation: Thirty-one million previously uninsured Americans will have insurance.
2. Low/Middle Income Americans Will Not Go Without Coverage: For low-income Americans struggling near the poverty line, the bill represents the largest single expansion of Medicaid since its inception. Combined with subsidies for middle income families, the bill’s provisions will ensure that working class Americans will no longer go without basic health care coverage.
3. Insurance Companies Will Never Be Able to Drop or Deny You Coverage Because You Are Sick: Insurers can no longer deny coverage because of a pre-existing condition. They can’t rescind coverage or impose lifetime or annual limits on care. Significantly, the bill also ends insurer discrimination against women — who currently pay as much as 48% more for coverage than men — and gives them access preventive services with no cost sharing.
4. Lowers Premiums For Families: The Senate bill could lower premiums for the overall population by 8.4%. For the subsidized population, premiums would decrease even more dramatically. According to the CBO, “the amount that subsidized enrollees would pay for non-group coverage would be roughly 56 percent to 59 percent lower, on average than the nongroup premiums charged under current law.”
5. Invests in Keeping People Healthy: The bill creates a Prevention and Public Health Fund to expand and sustain funding for public prevention programs that prevent disease and promote wellness.
6. Insurers Can’t Offer Subprime Health Care: Insurers operating in the individual and small group markets will no longer sell subprime policies that deny coverage when illness strikes and you need it most. Everyone will be offered an essential benefits package of comprehensive benefits.
7. Helps Businesses Afford Coverage: Small employers can take advantage of large risk pools by purchasing coverage through the bill’s state-based exchanges. Employers with no more than 25 employees would receive a tax credit to help them provide coverage to their employees. The bill also establishes a temporary reinsurance program for employers providing coverage to retirees over the age of 55 who are not eligible for Medicare.
8. Improves Medicare: The bill eliminates the waste and fraud in the Medicare system, gets rid of the special subsidy to private insurers participating in Medicare Advantage and extends the life of the Medicare trust fund by 9 years. It also closes the doughnut hole that affected 3.4 seniors enrolled in Medicare Part D in 2008.
9. Reduces The Deficit: Not only would the bill expand coverage to 30 million Americans without adding to the nation debt, it would also reduce the deficit by up to $409 billion over 10 years.
10. Reduces National Health Spending: A CAP-Commonwealth Fund analysis concludes the bill could reduce overall spending by close to $683 billion over 10 years – with the potential to save families $2,500. Even the most conservative government estimates conclude that the bill would reduce national health care expenditures by at least 0.3% by 2019
Howard Dean wants to scrap this bill and start over. I’m not saying that Howard Dean is wrong. There are many things in this bill that are unsavory, like the mandatory purchase of insurance and the interstate rule change, but there are many things in this bill that help. There are subsidies for those who will not be able to afford premiums. The final language of the bill is still weeks away. I say cool your jets, dear progressives, and let’s work toward passing this bill.
_____________________________________________________________
UPDATE: I jsut read a great article slamming Howard Dean and his call to kill the health reform bill. It is linked from the Huffington Post to the Washington Post. The article is short, but full of facts. By Ezra Klein:
…This morning, Howard Dean vowed to oppose the bill unless the state-based exchanges “act as prudent purchasers and select only the most efficient insurers.” (If that was included, he said, a “stripped-down” version of the bill would be acceptable, though it’s not clear what that means.)
What’s so strange about Dean’s objection is that the exchanges in the Senate bill (pdf) do act as “prudent purchasers,” that is to say, they set limits on the plans that can enter in the exchange to ensure that people are getting good choices. The relevant section begins on page 131 of the Senate bill. “The Secretary shall, by regulation, establish criteria for the certification of health plans as qualified health plans.” A couple of pages of relevant criteria follow, including marketing requirements (plans can be disqualified for focusing their marketing in outlets that would bring them uncommonly healthy enrollees), broad provider networks, coverage of options used by low-income folks (community health centers, say), quality measures, quality improvement strategies, consumer ratings, standardized benefit packages, etc.
And then, a couple of pages later, the language gets stronger. On page 143, the exchanges are given power to certify insurance plans based on whether “the Exchange determines that making available such health plan through such Exchange is in the interests of qualified individuals and qualified employers in the State.” On 144, premiums, and premium increases, enter explicitly into the discussion. Any insurance plan that wants to increase premiums has to submit a written justification for their decision. It will have to post that information on its Web site. And if the exchange is not convinced, it can decertify the plan.
Sounds pretty good to me!
__________________________________________________________
Technorati Tags:
blogging,
political opinion,
political opinions,
politics opinion,
democrats,
opinion,
political views,
political blog,
political commentary,
liberal blog,
progressive blog,
republicans,
a second look,
blog,
news opinion,
commentary,
Senate Health Care,
health care bill,
Senate Health Bill,
public option,
Medicare buy-in,
Howard Dean,
giveaway,
private insurers,
Jay Rockefeller,
Tom Harkin,
Sherrod Brown,
Joe Lieberman,
Ben Nelson,
John Podesta,
uninsured Americans,
low-income Americans,
subsidies,
pre-existing conditions,
Medicare,
national debt
Follow me on Twitter!
The Approaching Reagan Centennial: Adoration for a Tea Bagger
Re: Consortiumnews.com, By Robert Parry, March 18, 2010
The war on the middle class started with Reagan. The war on the poor whom Reagan called “welfare bums” began. Before Reagan, leaders understood that taking care of our social needs was not only the moral right, but it was also good for the economy. Reagan policies killed all that and pushed back on the upward struggles of the poor, as if the rise from poverty wasn’t hard enough.
His efforts to cheapen labor through union busting and stagnating wages, combined with less support for the newly poor by changing the rules for welfare and food stamps, were enough to tarnish his legacy, never mind the military and financial support of right-wing militia death squads in Central and South America.
Never mind his war on the environment, his war on good governance, and his war on public protections from ruthless corporations, but concentrating on what he did to the middle class’ struggle to overcome poverty and rise into affluence is enough to strangle and cut off any cheers for the late president. He left a legacy of shameful greed that still echoes through media outlets today.
There are some striking similarities to the right wing hate-filled rhetoric surrounding the health care debate and the fear mongering propaganda from the right over Medicare in the early 1960’s. From wiki:
Reagan’s talk of socialism and “the end of freedom in America” could have come from the mouth of Sarah Palin and a plethora of other Republican leaders and throngs of social misfits, tea baggers and such who use socialism as a wedge issue and a red herring, hiding their support for the insurance industry. Almost 50 years have passed since Reagan issued this recording and even the most ardent anti-government right winger has to admit that Ronald Reagan could not have been more wrong about Medicare.
The dire warnings of a future that has us all living in a socialist nightmare never came to pass, and it won’t. Medicare became a much beloved entitlement and a political third rail. Medicare was, and continues to be, vastly successful. But, since the lesson of Medicare is so apparent, why are there new protests and cries from angry voices railing against what history has shown to be benign social imperatives of health care reform? The socialist nightmare that Reagan warned of never materialized, and it won’t. The tea party people should wake up and take a lesson on being on the wrong side from the original tea bagger, Ronald Reagan.
__________________________________________________________________