A Second Look Rotating Header Image

Fox News

Defunding Oil Rich Terrorist States is a Win-Win Situation (Video)

Support VoteVets.org

Re: Think Progress » Saudi-Funded Fox News Rejects Ad Arguing Against Middle East Oil Dependence

Last week, progressive veterans organization VoteVets.org released an ad arguing that “a clean energy climate plan would cut our dependence on foreign oil in half and cut oil profits for hostile nations.” The ad asserts that “every day, Iran gets $100 million richer selling oil around the world and peddling hate.”

While CNN and MSNBC have aired the ad, Fox News is refusing to do so. Politico reports Fox apparently found the ad “too confusing.”

Watch the ad:

What I find remarkable about this ad is that the folks at VoteVets.org have found the ultimate sanction against Iran that simultaneously helps fix the environment. Think about it. When we divert research and development funds away from big oil and to renewable forms of energy we can defund the Saudis, Iraq, Dubai, and Iran and all the other oil producing nations that support terrorism, in one form or another. Remember that almost all the 9/11 skyjackers were Saudi, not Iraqi. We can do that while cleaning our waterways, lessening the impact of offshore oil drilling, and setting up a beautiful future for our kids and grandkids.

But you can bet that if something clever and good for the working man comes along Fox News will refuse it. It will come to pass that the oil companies go the way of the horse and buggy. It is just a matter of time. There is only so much oil to be had and after they wring out every drop of it out of the earth, then what? SO, why not jump on the bandwagon and herald in a new age before that crisis hits?

In a statement issued to ThinkProgress, Richard Smith, a senior adviser to VoteVets who served in Afghanistan, says “the only confusing thing” is why Fox is rejecting the ad:

“There’s nothing confusing about the link between oil and terrorist funding, and even the most dyed-in-the-wool neocons agree on that point. The only confusing thing here is why FOX News would reject an ad that calls on Congress to defund our enemies by finding new sources of energy.

It’s unclear what Fox News’ motivations are. As Media Matters has documented, the network is a reliable source of misinformation on clean energy reform. Interestingly, Saudi oil tycoon Prince Alwaleed bin Talal owns a 7 percent stake in Fox News’ parent company News Corp, making him the largest shareholder outside the family of CEO Rupert Murdoch. But Murdoch has said the he is for a mandatory cap on carbon emissions and believes that Fox News ought to be covering the issue differently.

It is always very clear as to what Fox News’ motivations are. They probably coordinate with the GOP before they air any kind of ad, especially one that advocates clean air. They will misinform the public through omission. It’s like I’ve always said – the more you watch Fox News, the more misinformed you become.

___________________________________________________________________

Share

A Call for Civil Discourse

Re: Obama Michigan Graduation Speech: President’s Advice To Class Of 2010, Associated Press, Updated: 05- 1-10 11:48 PM

ANN ARBOR, Mich. (AP) — In a blunt caution to political friend and foe, President Barack Obama said Saturday that partisan rants and name-calling under the guise of legitimate discourse pose a serious danger to America’s democracy, and may incite “extreme elements” to violence.

The comments, in a graduation speech at the University of Michigan’s huge football stadium, were Obama’s most direct take about the angry politics that have engulfed his young presidency after long clashes over health care, taxes and the role of government.

Good for him. President Obama is doing his part to calm the vehement rhetoric thrown around lately by the right wing. He has a big pulpit at his disposal and he’s using it here for public safety.

In his 31-minute speech, Obama didn’t mention either Palin or the tea party movement that’s captured headlines with its fierce attacks on his policies. But he took direct aim at the anti-government language so prevalent today.

“What troubles me is when I hear people say that all of government is inherently bad,” Obama said after receiving an honorary doctor of laws degree. “When our government is spoken of as some menacing, threatening foreign entity, it ignores the fact that in our democracy, government is us.”

Government, he said, is the roads we drive on and the speed limits that keep us safe. It’s the men and women in the military, the inspectors in our mines, the pioneering researchers in public universities.

The right wing is trying to turn “the government” into a bogeyman by using language that borders on inciting to violence. Cramming down the government is something the Republican Party has long held as a goal. “Smaller government” was the Ronald Reagan mantra and a thinly veiled acronym for “let’s gut Medicare and Social Security” (But let’s flood the military industry). Reagan communicated his view of a smaller government without violent rhetoric, though, and would have frowned on FOX News and Sarah Palin’s ranting.

President Clinton bravely stepped forward on April 19th giving a speech at The Center for American Progress to mark the anniversary of the Oklahoma City bombing. Think Progress reported that:

Clinton’s message was clear: Debate and free speech are essential, but leaders must be “responsible” with their words because they fall on the “serious and the delirious alike,” and it only takes one deranged person like Timothy McVeigh to cause massive harm.

It is very hard to disagree with this for most folks, but the right wingers reacted quickly and harshly to Clinton’s message, of course. Firing back at Clinton was the usual echo chamber. The New York Post criticized Clinton by downplaying the Tea Party’s calls for violence as “peaceful – if not rambunctious – political dissent” and along with The National Review and almost every FOX News host countering Clinton’s admonition of the hate mongering by the right. Sean Hannity questioned Clinton by trying to separate the incendiary talk of the right from domestic terrorism, and FOX News’ culpability.

From Think Progress:

Fox News host Sean Hannity: [N]ow, Bill Clinton advanced it, the latest one — that, you know, the Tea Party movement, the incendiary rhetoric by the right, et cetera, et cetera, and talk radio and hosts like myself, that somehow we are advocates of — of domestic terrorism like Tim McVeigh?”

Inflated numbers, along with an attempt to paint those propelling the hate as victims:

National Review’s Jonah Goldberg: “Now we have what increasingly appears to be an orchestrated media campaign, led by Bill Clinton and Barack Obama’s think tank, to demonize tens of millions of American taxpayers because they keep invoking the Constitution.”

For the right wing echo machine to do this kind of rapid response on Clinton’s speech, well, it must have hit a nerve.

This report on right wing violence is from The Washington Monthly, June 10, 2009:

[The DHS report warning of an increase of right wing extremism is] hardly an unreasonable point. Two months ago, Richard Poplawski, a right-wing extremist, allegedly gunned down three police officers in Pittsburgh, in part because he feared the non-existent “Obama gun ban.” A few weeks ago, Scott Roeder, another right-wing extremist, allegedly assassinated Dr. George Tiller in Kansas. A few hours ago, Von Brunn, another right-wing extremist, allegedly opened fire at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum.

There are other recent examples that bear similar characteristics. This story out of Tennessee from last year continues to haunt.

“Knoxville police Sunday evening searched the Levy Drive home of Jim David Adkisson after he allegedly entered the Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church and killed two people and wounded six others during the presentation of a children’s musical. [...]

 Inside the house, officers found “Liberalism is a Mental Health Disorder” by radio talk show host Michael Savage, “Let Freedom Ring” by talk show host Sean Hannity, and “The O’Reilly Factor,” by television talk show host Bill O’Reilly.

The shotgun-wielding suspect in Sunday’s mass shooting at the Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church was motivated by a hatred of “the liberal movement,” and he planned to shoot until police shot him, Knoxville Police Chief Sterling P. Owen IV said this morning.

Adkisson, 58, of Powell wrote a four-page letter in which he stated his ‘hatred of the liberal movement,’ Owen said. ‘Liberals in general, as well as gays.’”

President Clinton was right. The angry, violent language falls on the ears of both the sane and insane alike. This violence in fueled by confrontational talk. This report from Media Matters for America, April 7th, 2010 concerning the threats to the Speaker of the House’s life  and the arrest of Gregory Giusti:

Following the arrest of Gregory Giusti for allegedly threatening Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s life over health care reform, Giusti’s mother stated that Fox News was a factor in her son’s alleged actions. In the wake of this incident, Media Matters for America takes a look back at Fox News’ recent history of violent rhetoric and the apocalyptic language the network’s employees used to describe the then-impending passage of health care reform.

His mother blames his friends and FOX News. From an April 7 broadcast by ABC’s San Francisco affiliate, KGO-TV:

ELEANOR GIUSTI: Greg has — frequently gets in with a group of people that have really radical ideas and that are not consistent with myself or the rest of the family and — which gets him into problems. And apparently I would say this must be another one that somehow he’s gotten onto either by — I’d say Fox News or all of those that are really radical, and he — that’s where he comes from.

In conclusion, this warning by the President of the United States from Obama Michigan Graduation Speech: President’s Advice To Class Of 2010:

The financial meltdown dramatically showed the dangers of too little government, he said, “when a lack of accountability on Wall Street nearly led to the collapse of our entire economy.”

But Obama was direct in urging both sides in the political debate to tone it down. “Throwing around phrases like ‘socialists’ and ‘Soviet-style takeover,’ ‘fascists’ and ‘right-wing nut’ – that may grab headlines,” he said. But it also “closes the door to the possibility of compromise. It undermines democratic deliberation,” he said.

“At its worst, it can send signals to the most extreme elements of our society that perhaps violence is a justifiable response.”

___________________________________________________________________

Share

From the eMail bag: Limbaugh & Beck Laugh at the Uninsured

Media Matters for America wrote:

Fox News:


From: Media Matters for America [action@mediamatters.org]
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 10:23 PM
To: Tom
Subject: Fox News: “Voice of the opposition” on health care reform

Conservatives mock the uninsured

For the conservative perspective on the country’s health care problems, look no further than Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck. Since the beginning of time, politicians have used personal anecdotes to accentuate policy points, and the bipartisan health care summit was no different. But conservatives went out of their way to respond to the summit by mocking the uninsured — specifically, remarks from Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY), who told the story of a woman without health insurance who “had no denture. She wore her dead sister’s teeth.”

Multi-millionaire Limbaugh, who has claimed “there is no health care crisis,” responded to Slaughter by asking, “Isn’t that why they make applesauce?”

LIMBAUGH: You know I’m getting so many people — this Louise Slaughter comment on the dentures? I’m getting so many people — this is big. I mean, that gets a one-time mention for a laugh, but there are people out there that think this is huge because it’s so stupid. I mean, for example, well, what’s wrong with using a dead person’s teeth? Aren’t the Democrats big into recycling? Save the planet? And so what? So if you don’t have any teeth, so what? What’s applesauce for? Isn’t that why they make applesauce?

Multi-millionaire Glenn Beck similarly stated, “I’ve read the Constitution … I didn’t see that you had a right to teeth.” One of Beck’s co-hosts responded to the anecdote by talking in a baby’s voice: “I have no health care, Mr. Pwesident, and I have no feet and no tonsils because doctors took ‘em out.”

Conservative attitudes to the health care crisis perhaps can perhaps best be summed up in Limbaugh’s advice to a caller who couldn’t afford the $6,000 cost to treat his broken wrist: “Well, you shouldn’t have broken your wrist.” Media Matters’ John Santore wrote: “Politics aside, the real question is this: Why do ordinary Americans continue to listen to conservatives who don’t even pretend to care about the senseless indignities and horrors experienced by countless citizens of this country?”

The reaction to Slaughter’s health care anecdote comes days after conservatives also mocked Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid for linking unemployment to a rise in domestic abuse (a claim supposed by several studies). Steve Doocy, RedState.com, Jim Hoft, Mike Gallagher, and The Jawa Report all suggested Reid will abuse his wife if he loses his Senate seat. Conservative radio host James Harris, who describes himself as possessing “humor, grace, and insight,” went one further on Fox and claimed that Obama’s to blame for increased domestic violence reports in Nevada.

 

Limbaugh, the multi-millionaire, thinks it’s funny that a person can’t afford dentures and has to wear a dead person’s teeth. It’s not funny. It’s tragic. Millions of people have to suffer with illnesses because they cannot afford to see a doctor, illnesses that continue to worsen until it is so serious that they face death. Funny, right?

This from
Dr. Robert Fields, Cosmetic & Family Dentist cross-posted from here.

Danger #2: Dentures Increase the Risk Of Heart Disease And Oral Cancer
While tooth loss may seem like a small problem compared with other health ad fitness issues, it is often the first sign of bigger health problems for many people and can put them at higher risk for heart disease and oral cancer.

When dentures don’t properly fit, bacteria can lie in areas behind them and lead to bone disease and oral cancer. Oral Cancer is probably one of the least known forms, but the American Cancer Society reports that there will be approximately 30,000 new cases diagnosed this year alone.
Then there is Heart Disease, which has been linked to gum disease. When dentures do not fit correctly, you have a higher chance of gum disease. The reason a patient must be aware of these concerns is because dentures are causing more problems than just being uncomfortable and unattractive.

Limbaugh and Beck do not know what they are talking about. Ignore them.

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Share
You are protected by wp-dephorm: