A Second Look Rotating Header Image

David Axelrod

A Second Look | Incremental Change We Can Believe In

via The Health Care Speech, Revealed – The Daily Beast.

In his speech on Wednesday, September 8, the President will outline what he sees as necessary for insurance reform.

Obama inaguration speech

President Barack Obama plans to reach out to Republicans and reassure Democrats in his address to a joint session of Congress on Wednesday on health-care reform. Obama will warn them that perfectionism could result in no bill at all, as happened in 1994, Politico reports. Top aides say Obama will lay out a “President’s Plan,” which will make clear what he considers on the table and what warrants further debate. Obama will not scold the left and will reassure them about his commitment to the public option. But Obama doesn’t want to give the impression that health reform should only pass if it includes a government insurance plan. The speech is still being formed and the president has yet to decide if he’ll include nitty-gritty legislative details in the address.

Obama is going to tell us that insurance reform must include those things that will alleviate the financial pain that every American feels when they get seriously sick or injured, and alleviate the rising costs of out-of-pocket expenses every average American pays to our health care industry.

Giving Barack the benefit of the doubt, his viewpoints on insurance regulation are more than welcome. Some points he might make is that under his planthere will be no exorbitant out-of-pocket deductibles or co-pays, and that there will be no discrimination for pre-existing conditions. He will tell su that insurance reform must prevail, and he is right.

Obama will try to sell us on the idea that we cannot throw out the bathwater to save the baby -  that the public option is a goal and it is not the end-all. Conservatives will nod their approval, but what do you do with liberal progressives that worked their tails off to get him elected, who demand not only a public option but a full-blown single payer system such as H.R. 676, Medicare for All?

You tell them that what we need right now is insurance reform. The White House web site, along with all the rhetoric from Obama’s spokespersons, has changed the terminology from health care reform to insurance reform. You tell them that the public option is always on the table even when you have tossed in that particular bargaining chip. You tell them that this is a step toward the public option, which can wait, in a way that doesn’t set off another shit storm from the right-wing echo machine. This is what Obama plans to do Wednesday – tell the left that they will  get better insurance and at the same time soothe the right by down-playing the public option.

The White House mouth-pieces made the rounds today. David Axelrod was on NBC’s “Meet the Press” and Robert Gibbs was on ABC’s “This Week”.

Gibbs said Obama will refocus the debate on the benefits of overhauling the system: more security and lower costs for the majority of people who have health insurance, and new ways to help self-employed people and small businesses get coverage.

“People will leave that speech knowing where he stands,” said Gibbs.

Let’s hope.

Share

A Second Look | Even Huffington Post Hates Obama

via Obama Plans “New Season” Of More Direct Health Care Advocacy.
AP/Huffington Post   |  CHARLES BABINGTON
First Posted: 09- 2-09 08:53 AM   |   Updated: 09- 2-09 12:00 PM

Yet another AP article that is published in the so called “liberal media’s” leading on-line news source that slams President Obama. If Huffington Post wants to promote the progressive viewpoint, then they need to start editing these articles submitted by the

The Huffington Post

Associated Press because this article that begins with David Axelrod speaking about Obama’s new strategy quickly turns into a right-wing bragging session. This snippet is where things start to get contentious:

Congress’ August recess was brutal for Obama and his allies, as lawmakers faced raucous crowds denouncing Democrats’ health proposals. When Congress comes back Tuesday, Democratic leaders hope to change the dynamic by holding quiet, closed-door sessions with nervous colleagues and arguing that far-reaching health care changes can be good politics as well as good policy.

There’s not one word about how these “raucous crowds” were planted inside the town halls, or about how the whole fake grassroots activism was organized and seeded by AHIP, the nation’s largest insurance lobbyist. These phony protests are nothing short of a well funded insurance corporate campaign to kill much needed healthcare legislation.

The Associated Press, with the help of Huffington Post has once again broad-brushed the Democratic Party. This time as somehow inferior or weak by having to calm “nervous” colleagues.  If we left things up to Huffington Post, the right-wing news monkeys could start posting their hate-filled vitriol as legitimate news. Who needs FOX when we have the Huffington Post?

This next snippet is the last two paragraphs of the article and they are what Huffington Post wants you to walk away with – the last word per se:

Republicans approach Labor Day feeling upbeat about the ground they gained during the August recess. Some are confident that no amount of closed-door hand-holding of nervous Democratic lawmakers will reverse the momentum.

“After a disastrous month at home, the fact that Democrats’ new health care strategy is to hide in Washington from the people who elected them to get health care passed shows what bad shape they’re in,” said Antonia Ferrier, spokeswoman for House Republican leader John Boehner of Ohio.

It would do the Democratic Party much good if these headlining articles in the Huffington Post would end on a positive, progressive note instead of a blatant endorsement of the right-wing echo chamber’s talking points.

Share

A Second Look | Political Posturing For Personal Gain

The Progress Report wrote:

Political Posturing For Personal Gain


From: The Progress Report [progress@americanprogressaction.org]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 9:47 AM
To: tomc2322
Subject: Political Posturing For Personal Gain

Tomorrow night, President Obama will deliver an address to Congress discussing the economic challenges that lay ahead. Senior Obama adviser David Axelrod told the the New York Times that Obama plans to “present a road map for ‘how we get to a better day.’” “The country is looking for a clear sense of direction. This is an opportunity to talk to the nation about that,” Axelrod continued. Gov. Bobby Jindal (R-LA) will offer the Republican response to Obama. As House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) explained, Jindal will argue that the Republican party is not “simply the party of ‘opposition,’ but the party of better solutions.” As Jindal attempts to raise his national profile for a possible presidential run in 2012, his message to the nation will be hampered by the extremely transparent attempts of a number of prominent conservatives to “have their cake and eat it too” when it comes to the economic recovery policies offered by the Obama administration. Indeed, while conservatives in Congress made a show of opposing the recovery package, many are now touting its benefits. Likewise, conservative governors (Jindal included) are rejecting portions of stimulus funding to score points with the radical right at the expense of their residents. Instead of debating the possible pros and cons of the Obama administration’s economic policies, commentators like CNBC’s Rick Santelli are staging ill-informed “rants” on live TV and being rewarded for it. As Center for American Progress Vice President for Economic Policy explained, the recovery package is geared toward breaking “the downward spiral that is currently consuming the economy,” and “the bill includes very little overall that isn’t good public policy.”

This isn’t striking or breathtaking that there are Republicans out there that oppose stimulus from the government. One has to only remind oneself of the Republican mission: to gain power, hold that power, dissolve the government then create a laissez-fare economy.

Of course the recovery package is overall good policy. It is a step in the right direction. That is why they don’t like it. It isn’t good enough for the corporations. Once America is fully out the post hypnotic suggestions of Reagan and Bush 41 and Bush 43, once we get the sleepy out of our eyes and can we can see clearly, only then sill we start to move forward once again.

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Share
You are protected by wp-dephorm: