A Second Look Rotating Header Image

Conservative media

Let’s Lay Them on the Table and Compare

Re:  The man behind RedState.com shakes up the Republican Party – St. Petersburg Times, by Adam C. Smith, Times Political Editor, In Print: Monday, January 4, 2010

Red State bloggers

…Erickson, editor in chief of the RedState.com blog, is emerging as one of the most important and prescient new voices and opinion-shapers in the Republican Party. And he is an increasingly influential headache for party leaders seen as straying from conservative principles.

The St. Petersburg Times has published an article swooning over the success and influence of a guy named Erick Erickson, founder of the blog, RedState.com. Redstate is not the largest whack job blog, but it may be the most influential one.

Republicans for years have lamented how Democrats have been more effective at organizing and raising money online, and RedState was created in 2004 as an answer to the popular liberal site Daily Kos. In 2006 it was bought by Eagle Publishing, which also owns Human Events and Regnery Publishing, whose authors include Newt Gingrich, Laura Ingraham and Bernard Goldberg.

Erickson is the only paid employee at RedState, which features about two dozen volunteer contributors. With roughly 300,000 unique visitors monthly, RedState has lighter traffic than such conservative sites as biggovernment.com, townhall.com and hotair.com, but it tends to have a greater knack for driving the discussion among conservatives around Capitol Hill and activists across the country.

RedState.com gets an average 53,227 unique visitors per day. A unique visitor is a method of tracking human (as opposed to bots and webcrawlers) visitors to a sight within a specified time. For comparison among whack job blog sites, according to websitemark.net, biggovernment.com pulls 103,104 unique visitors per day. Townhall.com gathers in 81,877 per day. Hotair.com gets a whopping 122,187 unique visitors per day.

According to another website tracker, Websiteshadow.com, DailyKos.com’s unique visitor count is a off the charts with 514,437 daily hits and has a market value of over $513,000. Redstate.com comes in at only 99,342 unique visitors and has a market value of just over $191,000.

Just for kicks and giggles, let’s compare news outlets online, not counting newspapers like the Wall Street Journal and NY Times, we’ll keep it with just strictly internet news. Probably the most influential and most read conservative news outlet is foxnews.com (a codicil here, I’ve including foxnews.com because even though they have a huge news network, they do not produce a daily paper). Again, using websiteshadow.com as a source, Foxnews.com generates 1,794,100 daily unique visitors. The foxnews.com website only has a market value of $51,670,080. The second largest, purely conservative site is drudgereport.com and has 1,339,800 unique visitors per day and a market value of $38,586,240.

Purely liberal online news outlets are few, so it looks like liberals flock to just one. Without question the most read liberal news outlet (although they claim that they are neutral) is Huffingtonpost.com. They pull in 2,182,950 unique visitors per day and have a market value of $62,868,960. As with the NYTimes.com which many right wingers consider a liberal news outlet*, I can’t count thenation.com because they produce a weekly journal and have been since the 1860’s. The next closest thing to a purely liberal news outlet after Huffington Post would have to be slate.com with a daily visitor count of 662,200, and and worth of $19,071,360, after that maybe talkingpointsmemo.com with a daily unique hit count of 117,040. To compare the drudgereport.com which began as a compliment to a radio show to something on the left isn’t easy. The closest thing I can conjure is the fledgling website airamerica.com with a daily unique visitor count of only 20,790.

If you combine the right wing sites together they dominate the internet even though the left has used the internet to revolutionize how politics is played.

*One thing to keep in mind when comparing news outlets, and there are a plethora of them, is this: what conservatives consider to be liberal is not the same thing as what the liberals consider to be liberal. That is why you hear them complain so much about the “liberal media”. To right wingers, anything that is not the frothing-at-the-mouth, tea-bag fringe fanaticism is considered “liberal”. They think that CNN is “liberal media” when it is actually quite centrist with right-leaning tendencies as evidenced by their insistence on propelling right wing talking points.

_______________________________________________________________

Share

A Second Look | ACORN Is A Victim Of A Radical Right Set-Up

UPDATE 09/24/09

via ACORN Sues Makers of Pimp and Prostitute Video

BALTIMORE — Community activist group ACORN is suing the makers of a hidden-camera video that showed employees of its Baltimore office giving tax advice to a man posing as a pimp and a woman posing as a prostitute.

The liberal group contends that the audio portion of the video was obtained illegally because Maryland requires two-party consent to create sound recordings.

The two employees seen in the video were fired after it was posted online. The lawsuit says the employees, Tonja Thompson and Shera Williams, suffered “extreme emotional distress.”

The multimillion-dollar lawsuit seeks damages from James O’Keefe and Hannah Giles, who played the pimp and prostitute in the videos, and from conservative columnist Andrew Breitbart, who posted the videos on his Web site.

This is very good news. The vicitms of the fraud are fighting back and I am very happy about that. It’s high time that the right-wing radical estreminsts, who illegally and purposefully attemped to create a gothcha moment that was driven by ideology, are taught a lesson in manners. Maryland requires two party consent to create sound recordings. That is the reason that the former ACORN employees will win the suit.

PS: To say that ACORN is a liberal group is not entirely true. They are an organization of families who help the poor no matter their political affiliation.

________________________________________________________

Media Matters for America wrote:

Media Matters: Fox News’ incomplete, misleading ACORN coverage is just nuts


From: Media Matters for America [action@mediamatters.org]
Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2009 3:13 AM
To: tom
Subject: Media Matters: Fox News’ incomplete, misleading ACORN coverage is just nuts

If you get your news from right-wing talk radio and Fox News, you probably think America is being overrun by a hyper-corrupt organized prostitution ring headquartered in the White House.

In case you missed this story: Two conservative activists, Hannah Giles and James O’Keefe, visited a host of ACORN offices around the country posing as a pimp and prostitute. They asked for help establishing a brothel, and even stated that underage girls would be working for them. They had a surveillance camera and recorded at least four interactions with ACORN employees and claimed these employees provided them with assistance. All of the employees implicated have now been fired, and federal aid to ACORN has been cut off.

 

ACORN CEO Bertha Lewis

ACORN CEO Bertha Lewis

What is really embarrasing is that the Senate jumped in with both feet firmly planted on the side of Hannah Giles and James O’Keefe without a minute of investigation into the story. First the Senate and now the House, voted to stop any federal funding of ACORN due to these illegaly gained video tapes that show ACORN employees speaking with these two imposters. O’Keefe and Giles deliberately made apppointments with unsuspecting secretaries and front people in order to secretly grab a “gotcha” peice of damning video. The two imposters then handed the videos of the interviews over to FOX News and then the crap hit the fan.

It was just the beginning. “Obama is Van Jones, Obama is ACORN,” right-wing pundit Monica Crowley said on Wednesday. “Just as he is ACORN, just as he is Van Jones, he is racism,” Rush Limbaugh parroted the sentiment on Thursday. Radio host Jim Quinn said that we were all living in the “United States of ACORN,” and Fox News’ Megyn Kelly had Karl Rove on to talk about the tapes exposing what was now a “remarkable criminal enterprise.” The stakes couldn’t be higher. ACORN, after all, was on tap to receive “eight and a half trillion dollars of stimulus money,” according to Sean Hannity — a number that was a thousand times greater than the equally fictitious billions that Beck had accorded to the organization on behalf of the government. ACORN had suddenly ballooned from an organization which had received $53 million in federal funds over 15 years to representing 67 percent of America’s gross domestic product.

Fox was running so wild with the story that they were willing to lower their already dubious standards. The first problem was one of logic. Four videos were being promoted as unimpeachable proof that all of ACORN is equally corrupt — all 1,200 chapters and hundreds of ACORN employees. It was the opposite of how a credible investigation is supposed to function, in which conclusions are withheld until after all the facts are in. By comparison, here, the conservative media had a few isolated facts but were willing to extrapolate an entire thesis from them.

What the congress and the media failed to do was to consider that ACORN immeditaly fired the employees who gave these imposters advice and took quick action to remedy any more unprofessional behavior of their own frontdesk personnel.

CEO Bertha Lewis said, “We have all been deeply disturbed by what we’ve seen in some of these videos.  I must say, on behalf of ACORN’s Board and our Advisory Council, that we will go to whatever lengths necessary to reestablish the public trust.  For nearly forty years, ACORN has given voice to communities, and gotten results.  Right now, our nearly 500,000 member are working their hearts out for quality, affordable healthcare for every American and to help stop the foreclosure crisis.  We must get this process right, so the good work can go forward.”

Once FOX began airing the illicitly gained videos, the Senate, led by long-time ACORN hater Senator Mike Johanns (R-NE), almost immediately voted to withold all federal funds from ACORN without consideration of mitigating circumstances. The Senate did not consider that these two, Giles and O’Keefe, had actually been thrown out of ACORN’s offices and in one office the front desk person called the police when the actors mentioned underaged girls. What the Senate, in their fury of hate failed to do was to give ACORN, an organization that has helped millions of people, the chance to police their own employees – a courtesy even Wall Street has been given in the past.

Instead of investigating these right-wing radical “journalists”, congress is now considering investigating ACORN instead, in support of FOX News’s whacky assumptions that all of ACORN’s 1200 offices around the US is somehow equally guilty.

Since this incedent, ACORN has taken corrective measures by firing those employees invlolved outright, and instituting a rigorous training program for its front office personnel. ACORN’s CEO, Bertha Lewis, has also begun an independant internal investigation.

“As a result of the indefensible action of a handful of our employees, I am, in consultation with ACORN’s Executive Committee, immediately ordering a halt to any new intakes into ACORN’s service programs until completion of an independent review.  I have also communicated with ACORN’s independent Advisory Council, and they will assist ACORN in naming an independent auditor and investigator to conduct a thorough review of all of the organizations relevant systems and processes.  That reviewer, to be named within 48 hours, will make recommendations directly to me and to the full ACORN Board.  We enter this process with a commitment that all recommendations will be implemented.”

There are other mitigating circumstance that Congress and the main stream media has failed to take into consideration. There is another posting on this blog regarding Tresa Kaelke. Media Matters details how FOX, and Congress, got it wrong:

More important, Fox News failed to vet the tapes. This was made painfully clear with the case of the San Bernardino ACORN office, which was featured in the fourth video to be released. In the footage, ACORN employee Tresa Kaelke claimed that she had murdered her former husband following a period of domestic abuse. On September 15, Beck and Sean Hannity both broadcast Kaelke’s assertion. Beck, who had reported on the supposed confession during his radio program, added on Fox, “She never spanked her kids, but she did shoot her husband dead.” Later that night, Hannity played the same clip, and in a rare moment of intellectual curiosity, asked about the veracity of the murder claim. “We’re working on it,” Giles said, which was enough for Hannity. The following morning, on September 16, Fox News’ Gretchen Carlson repeated the allegation, saying, “She killed somebody? Despite this, some lawmakers want to keep funding the group.”

But Kaelke’s ex-husbands are alive. The San Bernardino Police Department confirmed this simple fact on September 15, releasing a statement that read: “Investigators have been in contact with the involved party’s known former husbands, who are alive and well.” (Kaelke was soon quoted in an ACORN press release saying that she had made the claim because she was seeking to mislead the undercover videographers, whom she was suspicious of.) In spite of these developments, the next day, Hannity was still treating the San Bernardino tape as fully credible. He even hosted Giles again but failed to ask her about her own investigation into the truth of the claim. (Here’s a full timeline of the attention the San Bernardino video received.)

Here’s the dangerous part of this smear against ACORN; if you shut them down, you do harm to many Americans suffering from abject poverty from the Mississippi delta to the mountains of Kentucky to America’s inner cities.  ACORN is made up of over 400,000 member families and is the nation’s largest grassroots community organization of low income families. A coordinated attack on ACORN is a coordinated attack on the poor.

The tragedy in this is not the lack of discreation by ACORN employees although they are gulty of violating ACORN’s rules and were fired for it. The real tragedy here is that ACORN is plainly a victim of radical right bloggers, scam artists, and an entire News network that propels a rabid hatred of the poor and supporters of the poor, and has the full support of the Republican Party.

 

Technorati tags:

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Share

A Second Look: Media Matters: Conservative media peddle a raw deal

Media Matters for America wrote:

Media Matters: Conservative media peddle a raw deal


From: Media Matters for America [action@mediamatters.org]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 5:44 PM
To: tomc2322
Subject: Media Matters: Conservative media peddle a raw deal

The conservative punditocracy that has spent the past eight years propping up a president who gave us an illegitimate war and leaves us with an almost unimaginably bad economic crisis apparently grows weary of defending this spectacular failure of a president. And so they have begun to shift their efforts to an easier task: trying to turn Americans against the president who ended the Great Depression, initiated the minimum wage, created Social Security, and helped defeat the Nazis.

Here we go again, more misdirection. The corprate media is still drinking the Bush Milkshake, one that has turned to sour curds long ago.

Brit Hume

On Fox News, for example, Brit Hume insisted this week that “everybody agrees, I think, on both sides of the spectrum now, that the New Deal failed.”

Economist Paul Krugman, for example, disagrees.

Paul Krugman

Krugman may not have the gravitas that comes with being Washington managing editor of Fox News, but he does hold the most recent Nobel Prize in economics. Krugman says the New Deal included “long-run achievements” that “remain the bedrock of our nation’s economic stability” and “brought real relief to most Americans” and notes that “[b]y 1937, things were a lot better than they were in 1933.” According to Krugman, the New Deal would have been even more successful had Roosevelt not been “eager to return to conservative budget principles.”

Let’s see, Democrats have gained an even larger majority in the House, increased their majority in the Senate to almost cloture-proof (59), and now there is a Democratic President. It looks like the nation has fully embraced these conservative budget principles. NOT!

There is instead a wholesale rejection of “conservative budget principles”. We need to expand the New Deal because of it’s success.

Share
You are protected by wp-dephorm: