A Second Look Rotating Header Image

bankruptcy

A Second Look | Here We Go Again with the Almighty Opinion Poll

(NEW! YOU CAN NOW POST COMMENTS WITHOUT REGISTERING AND WITHOUT AWATING MODERATION)

via  Democrats Ponder Health-Care Suicide | CommonDreams.org
by Robert Parry, Published on Sunday, October 4, 2009 by Consortiumnews.com

I’ve quoted many opinion polls myself. I’ve waved them in the face of the opposition, screaming righteously that there is depth and meaning to my cause because a majority of people believe as I do.

Then comes the hard cold facts of the matter. Nobody in power gives a rats ass about what the majority of the people think.

Robert Parry has many good points in this article about how the Senate Finance Bill will become the vehicle for the full Senate vote, that it is “industry friendly” to say the least, and that it is not very timely not taking effect until 2013 when thousands more will have filed bankruptcy over their medical bills.

But Parry interjects the results of an opinion poll to bolster his opinion. This act is not remarkable considering it actually reflects what the common folks think, but it compels no one to do anything.

…What Americans Want

What Americans want is affordable health coverage provided in as simple a package as possible.

That was the finding of a New York Times/CBS News poll which discovered widespread confusion about the health proposals taking shape in Congress, but more than 2-1 support for a public option to compete with private insurers — 65 percent for a public option, 26 percent against and 9 percent no opinion. [NYT, Sept. 25, 2009]

After all, one of the attractions of the public option is its relative simplicity and cost-effectiveness. It could piggyback on the existing Medicare bureaucracy and thus get started quickly and cheaply. According to congressional budget analysts, it is the only plan that offers significant cost savings…

…Yet, despite this common sense – and broad voter support for the public option – the Senate Finance Committee rejected the idea. Chairman Baucus conceded that the concept was appealing, but he joined other conservative Democrats in voting no, claiming a public option couldn’t clear the 60-vote hurdle to stop a Republican filibuster. Continue reading…

So, the verdict is that even though there is that broad support for the public option, there won’t be any because it is not “industry friendly”, and thereby not able to garner enough votes from conservative Democrats to vote to close debate. As sad as this is, it is totally predictable.

These legislators whom we have proudly elected and reelected have created PACs and other legitimate ways for the different corporations to offer them bribes in the form of campaign contributions in order to gain their vote on certain matters so as to maximize profits for themselves. It is hard even for the young idealists not to take campaign contributions so excessive as to guarantee reelection.

This is a crime that has been legislated into legality and until that changes, there isn’t enough popularity polls in the world to change their minds. Popularity polls only count during the election, after that, they are toilet paper.

What Americans want? Well, this American wants the bribery and the palm greasing and the free trips and luncheons to end. The way to do that is to enact legislation providing for clean elections as Arizona has done. But if you want to get a good laugh out of Senator Baucus and the rest of the conservatives, ask them to enact legislation to end the cash stream.

Public opinion polls may demand the public option, but until public opinion pays as well as something that is more “industry friendly”, real reform is just not happening.  If clean elections aren’t anywhere on the radar screen, and they are not except at grassroots levels in a few states, then we must work within the system and provide a well funded powerful lobby in Congress to promote the people’s agenda. That is why I have written to MoveOn.org (without response, of course) and have asked them to take this on as a project.

There already exists progressive think tanks like the Center for American Progress, the Campaign for America’s Future, and also PACs like The American Progressive Caucus Policy Foundation who recently named Darcy Burner to head that organization. But what we really need is a well funded large organization that can compete with the high rollers in wooing more conservative Democrats to be better Democrats and thereby providing us common folks with a stronger voice. Darcy Burner has done great and wonderful things toward solidifying the progressives in the House of Representatives with only a small, underfunded, organization totally dependent on grassroots donations for support. Just think what an organization with 5 million members could do given the talent and money it needs to sway opinion the Senate.

Forget the results of opinion polls until election time. Take them with a grain of salt, then let them go. Nothing but heartache and frustration results from the results.

 

Share

A Second Look | Medicare For All? – Keep Dreaming

(NEW! YOU CAN NOW POST COMMENTS WITHOUT REGISTERING AND WITHOUT AWATING MODERATION)

via Medicare for All: Yes We Can | CommonDreams.org

by Holly Sklar, Published on Saturday, September 26, 2009 by CommonDreams.org

More Americans die of lack of health insurance than terrorism, homicide, drunk driving and HIV combined.

Grandma could be dead from lack of health insurance before she turns 65 and gets Medicare – 80 percent of first-time grandparents are in their 40s and 50s.

America is the only country that rations the right to health care to those 65 and older.

Lack of health insurance kills 45,000 American adults a year, according to a new study published in the American Journal of Public Health. One out of three Americans under age 65 had no private or public health insurance for some or all of 2007-2008…

…Even with health insurance, many Americans are a medical crisis away from bankruptcy. Research shows 62 percent of all bankruptcies in 2007 were medical, a share up 50 percent since 2001. Most of the medically bankrupt had health insurance – the kind insuring profits, not health care…

…Wendell Potter, CIGNA’s chief of corporate communications until quitting in 2008, testified to Congress, “The status quo for most Americans is that health insurance bureaucrats stand between them and their doctors right now, and maximizing profit is the mandate.” He said, “Every time you hear about the shortcomings of what they call ‘government-run’ health care, remember this: what we have now … and what the insurers are determined to keep in place, is Wall Street-run health care.”…

…Contrary to myth, the United States does not have the world’s best health care. We’re No. 1 in health care spending, but No. 50 in life expectancy, just before Albania, according to the CIA World Factbook. In Japan, people live four years longer than Americans. Canadians live three years longer. Forty-three countries have better infant mortality rates.

All these facts, all this red meat, and I can find no potatoes, no completeness.

You could put all this in a book, take the book to the halls of Congress, and smack every Senator and Congressman you pass on the head with it and you will not change their minds. It’s like telling the truth to an inquisitor. Unless it is what they want to hear, then it is all a lie.

Democratic Party leaders have this bone in their brain that compels them to think that if they don’t act like Republicans, no one will love them. Republicans have long been associated with helping the rich, and now the Democrats, the working man’s champions, are in that same boat. The solution to this convolution is obvious and it has two parts.

The first part, is that there is too much corporate money being passed to these politicians and their PACs. If we had national clean elections as does Arizona, which are a way to control the amount of money politicians spend on themselves to get elected, then politicians would be more concerned with representing the people and acting on the majority opinion than what their electoral prospectus ciphers out to be.

The second part is term limits. In this typist’s humble opinion, members of Congress should be limited to two terms of four years each, like the President, for both Senators and Congressmen. If this takes an amendment to the Constitution, then so be it. The drive to get reelected trumps the majority opinion – job preservation is the motivator behind making law and that should be a crime.

We can bask in the dreamy dream land of Medicare for all and sip our drinks by the pool in an idyllic setting, but the dirty, ugly, dusty, concrete truth is that there is nothing in that notion that would make the fat cats richer, so there is no political will for it.

…Tell President Obama and Congress, Yes we can have Medicare for All. Rep. Anthony Weiner’s amendment would substitute the text of the Expanded and Improved Medicare for All Act (HR 676), which has 86 co-sponsors, for House legislation HR 3200. Like the even worse Baucus bill in the Senate, HR 3200 would feed for-profit insurers more customers without providing the universal health care Medicare could provide at much lower cost…

Write and dial until your fingers turn blue. Nothing will happen. We did not elect Rep. Dennis Kucinich as President although he ran for it and we could have. We elected another DLC-like centrist who acts like he wants to be the head of both parties.

We could have elected Dennis, who wrote HR 676, if we had voted for him, but we were too caught up in the rapturous voice of change to think about our progressive dreams and who could take us there. We formed Barrack Obama in our image and projected on him the picture of a progressive savoir when all along, underneath it all, he was and is a fence-straddling centrist with his own agenda.

So go for it. Call every member of Congress, write them letters, send them email. I’ve done some of that. I’m still waiting. While you have them on the phone ask them what they think about limiting their own terms in Congress and limiting the money they can raise for reelection. You might get a laugh.

 

Share

A Second Look: From the Office of Senator Cantwell

Maria_Cantwell@cantwell.senate.gov wrote:

From the Office of Senator Cantwell


From: Maria_Cantwell@cantwell.senate.gov
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 8:30 AM
To: Tom
Subject: From the Office of Senator Cantwell

Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA)

On March 5, 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives approved the Helping Families Save Their Homes Act of 2009 (H.R.1106) by a vote of 234 to 191, which included a provision to give bankruptcy judges the authority to modify mortgage terms for troubled homeowners in order to encourage lenders to work with troubled homeowners to renegotiate mortgages before a homeowner is forced into bankruptcy. This legislation has been referred to the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs for further review. On March 20, 2009, U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid publicly announced that the Senate will debate this legislation in late April 2009.


The time to debate this legislation is now. It’s hard for folks who are under water in their homes to continue to pay 7-10% on a $175,000 and up ARM that will readjust in a year or two. They need help today. Sometimes congress critters are so far removed from money troubles like this that they just don’t understand. They say that they feel your pain, but they are just saying that. Most of them haven’t felt those kinds of poverty pains since college. When someone finds themselves facing down foreclosure – people knocking on your door asking when and where the auction will be – they face daunting traumatic stress. They don’t know where to turn because at this point in the game, the lender has stopped trying to negotiate. This legislation that enables bankruptcy judges to cram down the mortgage terms should have been passed months ago. Time is wasting.

,,,,,,,,,,,

Share
You are protected by wp-dephorm: