A Second Look Rotating Header Image

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act

A Second Look | Krugman Sucks! Attacking From The Left Again!

via Op-Ed Columnist – Obama’s Trust Problem – NYTimes.com.

Paul Krugman, Obama Political Enemy

NY Times op-ed columnist and Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman is at it again. At a time when the President is at his most difficult moment since inauguration with the health care debate, Krugman goes on the attack.

He is attacking the President from the left again, not satisfied that we at least have a Democrat in the White House that has achieved much since arriving there a mere eight months ago. Examples? The right-wing Supreme Court ruled in Ledbetter v. Goodyear that it was okay that women get paid less than men and not be able to sue for it, and then Obama fixed that by signing the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009. Where was the kudos for Obama from Krugman? Crickets.

There have been many accomplishments in Obama’s eight months in office.

Obama inherited a nation whose economy was in free-fall and he has been able to get the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act passed with no Republican support in the House and very little in the Senate. He has also passed a budget plan that puts emphasis on eliminating fraud and abuse and overall fiscal responsibility after inheriting a $1.3 trillion deficit from Bush.

Here are just a few more examples of President Obama’s accomplishments from the Huffington Post:

  • $19 billion in the stimulus package to help implement an electronic medical record system
  • innovative online messaging by streaming every press conference and hosting question-and-answer sessions with the president, and publishing the first White House blog
  • Obama Department of Transportation has approved 2,500 highway projects and they have move $9.3 billion out the door since February in stimulus money
  • $2,500 tax credit to help offset the cost of tuition (among other expenses) for those seeking a college education. Nearly five million families are expected to save $9 billion
  • $2 billion in stimulus cash for advanced batteries systems for electric and hybrid cars
  • CARS, the Car Allowance Rebate System – cash for clunkers
  • the DOJ secured $2 billion for Byrne Grants, which funds anti-gang and anti-gun task forces and is expected to have huge impacts in urban gang control

You’d think we’d be hearing from Krugman about some, at least one, of these accomplishments. But hell no. Krugman is once again baselessly attacking a President that has bent over backwards to create a bipartisan atmosphere in Washington. He has reached out to the Republicans time and again only to have that door slammed in his face. Leftist economists like Krugman accuse him of appeasement and then attack him personally as a weakling.

It’s hard to avoid the sense that Mr. Obama has wasted months trying to appease people who can’t be appeased, and who take every concession as a sign that he can be rolled.

Krugman is critical of not only the President’s policies, but insultingly talks of his moral failings and his lack of clarity. Notice how he starts this next paragraph with the issue of “health care itself”, then immediately slides into a personal barrage, forgetting health care itself, but using the health care issue to wedge in his personal attack on Obama insinuating that the President has somehow become “uninspiring” and now he is nothing more than a “dry technocrat”:

On the issue of health care itself, the inspiring figure progressives thought they had elected comes across, far too often, as a dry technocrat who talks of “bending the curve” but has only recently begun to make the moral case for reform. Mr. Obama’s explanations of his plan have gotten clearer, but he still seems unable to settle on a simple, pithy formula; his speeches and op-eds still read as if they were written by a committee.

If Krugman is so worked up about Obama’s presidency at this point after only eight months, then a year from now Krugman will be a total wreck. He is the epitome of the enemy that should be kept closer. Yes, Krugman is the enemy, it matters not if he is from the far left. He still supplies the right with ammunition against his fellow Democratic president. With supporters like Krugman, who needs the right, right?

Krugman, the high and mighty Nobel Prize winner, sucks.

Share

A Second Look: Shameful Corporate Greed

The Progress Report wrote:

Shameful Corporate Greed

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY)


From: The Progress Report [progress@americanprogressaction.org]
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 9:37 AM
To: tomc2322
Subject: Shameful Corporate Greed
CONGRESS — FLASHBACK: McCONNELL SAID STIMULUS WON’T HAVE ANY PROBLEM ‘GETTING OVER 60 VOTES’: On Wednesday, the House passed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act on a 244-188 vote, with every Republican voting against the legislation. Now the bill moves to the Senate for debate and a potential vote next week. The Senate version of the legislation is not entirely in sync with the House’s version.McClatchy reported last week that the Senate Finance Committee has already “added some provisions desperately sought by corporate America,” such as allowing “some
companies to reduce taxes if they buy down their debt between late 2008 and 2011.” The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups lobbied heavily for the measure.Even with these extra business provisions — which conservatives have complained are absent from the House bill — nine out of 10 Republicans on the Finance Committee voted against the draft. Just few weeks ago, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said that he doesn’t think the economic recovery bill will have “any problem getting over 60 votes.” He also reportedly promised that Senate Republicans “would not filibuster against the stimulus package.” On NPR yesterday, however, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) issued a filibuster threat, saying that the recovery package would need 60 votes to pass. Will McConnell keep his word? Or will conservatives continue to block the economic recovery while advocating a return to Bushonomics?

The Democrats in the Senate have capitulated so much that the Republicans in the Seante expect it to continue. Since the cloture motion to kill a filibuster requires 60 votes, and since we only have 58 at present, then my suggestion is to bring up the nuclear option. Kill the 60 vote rule to overcome fillibuster. Lower it to 51.

,,,,,,

Share
You are protected by wp-dephorm: