A Second Look Rotating Header Image

AHIP

A Second Look | Even Huffington Post Hates Obama

via Obama Plans “New Season” Of More Direct Health Care Advocacy.
AP/Huffington Post   |  CHARLES BABINGTON
First Posted: 09- 2-09 08:53 AM   |   Updated: 09- 2-09 12:00 PM

Yet another AP article that is published in the so called “liberal media’s” leading on-line news source that slams President Obama. If Huffington Post wants to promote the progressive viewpoint, then they need to start editing these articles submitted by the

The Huffington Post

Associated Press because this article that begins with David Axelrod speaking about Obama’s new strategy quickly turns into a right-wing bragging session. This snippet is where things start to get contentious:

Congress’ August recess was brutal for Obama and his allies, as lawmakers faced raucous crowds denouncing Democrats’ health proposals. When Congress comes back Tuesday, Democratic leaders hope to change the dynamic by holding quiet, closed-door sessions with nervous colleagues and arguing that far-reaching health care changes can be good politics as well as good policy.

There’s not one word about how these “raucous crowds” were planted inside the town halls, or about how the whole fake grassroots activism was organized and seeded by AHIP, the nation’s largest insurance lobbyist. These phony protests are nothing short of a well funded insurance corporate campaign to kill much needed healthcare legislation.

The Associated Press, with the help of Huffington Post has once again broad-brushed the Democratic Party. This time as somehow inferior or weak by having to calm “nervous” colleagues.  If we left things up to Huffington Post, the right-wing news monkeys could start posting their hate-filled vitriol as legitimate news. Who needs FOX when we have the Huffington Post?

This next snippet is the last two paragraphs of the article and they are what Huffington Post wants you to walk away with – the last word per se:

Republicans approach Labor Day feeling upbeat about the ground they gained during the August recess. Some are confident that no amount of closed-door hand-holding of nervous Democratic lawmakers will reverse the momentum.

“After a disastrous month at home, the fact that Democrats’ new health care strategy is to hide in Washington from the people who elected them to get health care passed shows what bad shape they’re in,” said Antonia Ferrier, spokeswoman for House Republican leader John Boehner of Ohio.

It would do the Democratic Party much good if these headlining articles in the Huffington Post would end on a positive, progressive note instead of a blatant endorsement of the right-wing echo chamber’s talking points.

Share

A Second Look | Right Wing Activism Is Faked

The Progress Report wrote:

Conservatives Try To Pare Down Reform

From: The Progress Report [progress@americanprogressaction.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 8:48 AM
To: tom
Subject: Conservatives Try To Pare Down Reform

Conservatives have used the August recess to mount an organized opposition to President Obama’s health care reform efforts. Even as 14,000 Americans lose their health insurance coverage every single day — half a million will become uninsured while Congress is on vacation — Republicans are insisting that Democrats pare down existing reform legislation. “We need to slow down and do a little less,” Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), the ranking member on the Senate Finance Committee and member of the “Gang of Six” tasked with producing bipartisan health care legislation, told a town hall gathering in Pocahontas, IA, on Monday. Similarly, during an appearance on CBS’s Face the Nation, Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND) predicted that the bill out of the Senate Finance Committee is “going to have to be significantly less than what we’ve heard talked about.” Yesterday’s revised deficit projections have given conservatives an additional argument for paring down existing legislation. Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN) issued a statement arguing that the higher projections were “a flashing red light for any health care proposal that doesn’t reduce the cost of health care for Americans and their government,” and Rep. Dave Camp (R-MI), the ranking Republican on the Ways and Means Committee, declared that “if the House Democrats’ unaffordable $1 trillion health care bill wasn’t dead before, it should be now.”

Progressives must repeat and propel the truth behind the myth of this so-called “grassroots” effort at town hall meetings meant to stop the public option. When the above mentioned Congresspeople get any notion that there is a populist movement behind them to kill health reform they will continue to fight against it with whatever false or misleading statements they can.

Without support from us, our Congresspeople on the left will start listening to the lunatic fringe on the right and will think, in our absence, that what these whack-jobs are saying could have some weight. We liberals must let the truth behind these fake grassroots protest go viral.

The progressive movement that launched this era of change now has the burden of carrying the movement forward. We must get off our lazy asses and get to these meetings to counter the well organized and well funded opposition. They not only plant persons inside these town halls, but they give them scripts to follow – what to shout when a certain subject is broached. The instructions these radical loonies are handed when they step on the bus even goes as far as telling them where to sit. It is up to us, with utmost civility and sincerity, to tell these hate mongers the truth.

From the Huffington Post today in an article titled, LobbyBlog:

August 26, 2009

In a nod to the House Republicans who devised a chart supposedly showing the bureaucratic nightmare that would result from Democratic health care reforms, the Campaign for America’s Future has devised a chart of its own, titled “Who’s Paying to Kill Health Reform?”

It’s a tangled web, with big lobbying firms, industry groups, and Astroturf organizers all linked to town hall meetings. Reflecting a widely-held view among progressives, the big kahuna behind it all is the health insurance industry, via trade group America’s Health Insurance Plans.

2009-08-26-AHIP_chart7.jpg

Click for full sized image.

The chart is small, (click on image for full size) but you can plainly see that AHIP, America’s Health Insurance Plans, is squarely in the middle of the misinformation campaign. AHIP is perhaps the biggest PR company and lobby for the insurance industry.

Here’s an example of how high priced lobbying firms are used to fuel this so called “grassroots” movement:

AHIP used their subsidiary, Coalition for Medicare Choices, to hire the Dewey Square Group (a public affairs firm with specialties in “grassroots” and “grasstops” campaigns) who then fraudulently signed seniors names to letters to their Congressmen that regurgitated right-wing talking points against health care reform. The Dewey Square Group’s seniors weren’t the only victims. Seniors from other places discovered the treachery and called the newspapers.

AHIP has also turned out their own 50,000 employees to town hall meetings and has them involved in a letter writing campaign. This snippet from Think Progress:

AHIP, the lobbying juggernaut representing the industry, says 50,000 employees have been engaged in writing letters and making phone calls to politicians or attending town hall meetings.

These are just two examples of how the Astroturf, fake “grassroots”, movement has spread. We progressives must disseminate the truth and dispel the rumors and lies as far as our venues will take it. Today another 14,000 Americans lost access to health care because of the lies that the right is spreading. We must spread the truth.

UPDATE
6:49 PM PDT

From Mike Papantonio: Who’s Funding Healthcare Opposition?

One of the phony consumer groups that has created chaos at town hall meetings is a group called Conservatives for Patients Rights (CPR). The founder of CPR, Rick Scott, was CEO of Columbia HCA during a time when Columbia was punished with a 1.7 billion dollar U.S. Government penalty for fraud. The caliber of fraud that Mr. Scott allowed to occur at his company not only included ripping off patients, doctors, and the government, it also included kickbacks to health care providers.

Mr. Scott is back with his fraud games by trying to convince the brain dead media that the loonies showing up to shout and scream at town hall meetings represent America’s majority. Media has become incapable of asking basic questions like: Who’s money is paying for these protesters for hire?

Here is what Mr. Scott’s “protesters” probably don’t know: In the last 10 years, the health care insurance industry has increased their profits by 450 percent. In fact, if Rick Scott’s plan succeeds in ending reform, profits will get even bigger for the cash fat insurance industry.

The Pap Attack is right on target, once again. He has pulled back the curtain to expose the cockroaches scrambling from the light. Kudos.

Technorati Tags:

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Share

A Second Look: AFL-CIO NOW BLOG | Insurers Fight Health Care Reform with Dirty Tricks, But Public Supports Obama Plan

via AFL-CIO NOW BLOG | Insurers Fight Health Care Reform with Dirty Tricks, But Public Supports Obama Plan.

More proof out this week that the insurance industry’s sweet words for health care reform are dripping with hypocrisy. America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), which has been pushing a sham health care reform campaign masquerading as a grassroots initiative, now seems to be using dirty tricks and outright falsehoods in an attempt to keep some of their most profitable programs.

Jason Rosenbaum writes on Health Care For America Now! that AHIP is sending letters to Massachusetts newspapers under the names of real seniors—who are unaware their names are being used—demanding that their representatives in Congress protect the Medicare Advantage health care program.

Medicare Advantage is George W. Bush’s privatization experiment, which put millions of dollars in the hands of private insurance companies. President Obama has proposed to stop subsidizing private insurers through Medicare Advantage.

Unlike the health insurance industry, a large majority of Americans supports President Obama’s plan to finance national health care reform by eliminating tax breaks for the rich, according to a poll by Lake Research Partners.

The poll shows a clear majority of Americans (63 percent)  favor a health care funding proposal to raise taxes on those who earn more than $250,000 per year by decreasing their tax deductions. An even larger majority of those polled (80 percent) oppose funding health care reform by treating employer health care benefits as income.

Obama’s budget sets aside more than $630 billion over the next 10 years as a reserve fund to help finance reforms to the nation’s health care system. To help pay for it, Obama will allow the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest 1 percent to expire in 2010 and will eliminate other tax breaks for those making more than $250,000 a year.

Support for this approach to funding health care reform has majority backing in every region of the country and among independent voters (52 percent) and Democrats (85 percent), according to Lake’s poll.

This is the right fight. Who cares about tea when this nations survival depends on fixing the health care crisis. The keys to winning this fight is complicated. The winning combination has to be affordability and widespread acceptance.

If Obama presents smart, nuanced, and a “no-nonsense” way to pay for a smart, nuanced and “no-nonsense” public health program, then it could gain traction in Congress. The funding has to be as attractive as the plan.

As I understand it, what sunk the Clinton plan back in the 1990′s was in large part the plan itself wasn’t sold well, and the cost. It was not widely received because it was perceived to be too expensive and the workings of it were kind of clunky. There is a pretty good account of the Clinton plan on the Alan Katz Health Care Reform Blog. Katz contends that the Clinton plan failed because it lacked bipartisan (special interest) input and thereby had no bipartisan (special interest) support. But in my humble opinion, sometimes special interests get to drive the legislative lobby train, and sometimes it’s driven by the populace. Acceptance by a large swath of America can get a bill passed just as quickly and that means you and I have to get busy once an agreed upon piece of legislation hits the floor. We can get out and sell it if  the legislation is something we can sink our teeth into with a cool way to pay for it.

There are many ideas out there floating around, some good  some wacky, about how to pay for public health care. Here’s an idea: What if there were a small contribution from everyone’s payroll with a small matching fund from their employers, similar to the Medicare tax and Social Security tax, to help pay for a good public plan? What if the government just dropped Medicare entirely, put all of our elderly and poor on the new plan, and  just switch the Medicare tax to the public health tax with a slight bump in rates? Employers should go for this because they can drop their coverage and put all their employees on the public plan at much less cost to them.

Oh! You DID consider that if a public plan is passed, there will be millions of employer-based health plans dropped – overnight – didn’t you? WalMart has most of their low-level, entry-wage part-timers (millions) on public health NOW. WalMart is the nation’s largest employer.

The right (and their echo chamber – the main stream media) is going to oppose it on ideological grounds no matter what comes out of the White House. Someone, like Rush Limbaugh will come up with ridiculous statements that will say something like Obama will deny you the right to see your own doctor because they are watching which office you walk into or the administration just doesn’t want to pay YOUR doctor because they don’t like you, and government bureaucracy will dictate what treatments you can have as opposed to insurance bureaucracy telling you which treatments you can have.

In 2004 during a hearing in Congress on the health care crises, legislators defined a public health care plan as “rationing” health care and pharmaceuticals. From an article at AlterNet by David Sirota:

In 2004, the nonpartisan group Families USA was asked to testify before a House committee on the issue of health care.

But of course, the hearing was only a formality, really. Congress had no intention of listening too much to anyone who didn’t come bearing a very large check. Still, the political goons in the employ of the big insurance companies understand that in even the most mundane situations in Washington, the truth must be squelched at all costs. So it was no surprise when amidst the boring proceedings, fireworks started.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) apparently had heard enough about the health care crisis. So in the middle of the testimony by Ron Pollack, Families USA’s executive director, Rogers snapped. “Just so I understand your organization,” he said, “you support rationing, limited drug use, pharmaceutical use?”

…Like a drooling pit bull snarling at a passerby, Rogers barked, “You support rationing health care for American citizens and limiting the ability for them to have access to pharmaceutical treatment in order to keep costs down.”

Medical rationing?

Incredible. Be prepared for the right wing’s fake outrage over any public plan proposed. We have to gird ourselves for a fight, even to the point of phone canvassing and door belling.

In February, 2009, Keith Olbermann debunks the right wing corporate lies that are already out about health care reform and this was just the stimulus bill debate. Keith interviews Lawrence O’Donnell about the falsehoods.

Share
You are protected by wp-dephorm: