A Second Look Rotating Header Image

news opinion

Forcing Women to Have Unwanted Children With the Disaster of Massive Overpopulation Looming is Very Nearsighted

Re: Texas Abortion Bill That Would Require Sonogram Before Procedure Poised To Become Law

AUSTIN, Tex (Reuters) – Women seeking an abortion would have to first get an ultrasound under a measure approved on Thursday by the Texas House of Representatives.

The proposal, the first significant bill considered by the House this year, was designated by Republican Governor Rick Perry as an emergency priority. A similar measure has already been approved by the state Senate.

Women would have to get an ultrasound between 24 and 72 hours before an abortion, the bill says. They would view the sonogram, hear an explanation of the image and listen to the heartbeat, if it is audible.

They want to break a woman’s heart after the rapist broke her nose, or worse. They want to rub a young teen’s pregnancy in her face after she has already had a traumatic emotional experience with her boyfriend and her parents. They are adding insult to injury, literally, in order to promote conservative ideology. They have no respect for the mother, or her life.

One interesting consideration that no one but me is considering right now is China and its massive overpopulation problem. The Chinese authorities force families to NOT have children under penalty of  imprisonment. I think the U.S. is the only country in the world that rewards large families with tax breaks. Looking forward to 2050, Texas could face some very awkward backpedaling when they realize that overcrowding, not abortion is the real problem. According to the Pew Research Center, the population of the U.S. will reach 438 million by the year 2050 most of the gain being Hispanic immigrants:

If current trends continue, the population of the United States will rise to 438 million in 2050, from 296 million in 2005, and 82% of the increase will be due to immigrants arriving from 2005 to 2050 and their U.S.-born descendants, according to new projections developed by the Pew Research Center.

These figures are a little dated, sure, but they emphasize a problem that will be impossible to deal with once it is here. What are the right-wing nutjobs going to do then? Shoot them all?

The balancing voice in the Texas legislature, the Democrats, have been largely ignored since the sweep of 2010, but they make a good point. If the pro-life crowd wants to force a woman to raise a child she doesn’t want, then those same right-wingers should help pay for the raising. From the source article:

Democrats tried unsuccessfully to add a series of amendments to the bill. One of those said that if the woman decided not to go through with the abortion, the state would have to pay for the college education for the child. Another, which also would have applied to cases in which the woman decided not to have the abortion, would have allowed women to get a court order to require the father of the child to get a vasectomy.

We all know the vasectomy thing won’t fly, but still, the father of the child, aka the rapist, should be forced to do something, right? After he gets out of prison, maybe? Anyway, the Texas Governor and Legislature says “nuts” to all that and full speed ahead! More births, please, and pass the potatoes (if there are any left)!

Share

FOX analyst Mike Huckabee Wants to Execute Julian Assange (but let murderers go free)

Re: Mike Huckabee: WikiLeaks Source Should Be Executed (VIDEO), The Huffington Post   |  Nick Wing Posted: 11-30-10 04:01 PM

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee and possible Republican presidential candidate provided a harsh assessment of what he believes to be an appropriate punishment for the source of the latest WikiLeaks transmission of U.S. embassy cables, saying that “anything less than execution is too kind a penalty.”

Maurice Clemmons

Maurice Clemmons

Huckabee seems to have a problem where convicts and convictions are concerned. In November, 2009 a man named Maurice Clemmons gunned down four Lakewood WA (a Tacoma suburb) police officers while they sat in a coffee shop on break. What’s this got to do with Huckabee? Nine years prior to the shooting in Lakewood, Clemmons sat safely in an Arkansas prison serving out a 60 year sentence for burglary and theft of property. From the Seattle Times:

When Clemmons received the 60-year sentence, he was already serving 48 years on five felony convictions and facing up to 95 more years on charges of robbery, theft of property and possessing a handgun on school property.

That’s a total of 213 years. Think about that. Clemmons could still be in jail today in Arkansas. But, then-Governor Mike Huckabee commuted his sentence, to the dismay of prosecutors, saying that Clemmons (an obvious danger to society) was only 17 when the offenses were committed. Again, from the Seattle Times:

“This is the day I’ve been dreading for a long time,” Larry Jegley, prosecuting attorney for Arkansas’ Pulaski County said tonight when informed that Clemmons was being sought for questioning in connection with the killings.

The prosecutors knew the danger of letting Clemmons go free. Four courageous keepers of the peace are dead at the hands of a madman and the entire nation mourns their passing. Huckabee had no reason for letting Clemmons out of prison other than his age at the time of the crimes. Now, Huckabee is applying this brilliant sense of justice that lets felons go free on the founder of the WikiLeaks website, Julian Assange, in hopes of gaining some political points.

He said that “anything less than execution is too kind a penalty”. Huckabee wouldn’t know “appropriate punishment” if he was pissing on it.

Share

The Result of Tea Party Thinking?

How can anyone refuse to pay a paltry $75.00 per year when the stakes are so high?

Re: No pay, no spray: Firefighters let home burn – U.S. news – Life – msnbc.com

Gene Cranick

Firefighters in rural Tennessee let a home burn to the ground last week because the homeowner hadn’t paid a $75 fee.

Gene Cranick of Obion County and his family lost all of their possessions in the Sept. 29 fire, along with three dogs and a cat. 

“They could have been saved if they had put water on it, but they didn’t do it,” Cranick told MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann.

The fire started when the Cranicks’ grandson was burning trash near the family home. As it grew out of control, the Cranicks called 911, but the fire department from the nearby city of South Fulton would not respond.

“We wasn’t on their list,” he said the operators told him.

Everyone knows the story by now. The Tennessee man, Cranick, who didn’t pay the firefighting dues and then landed high and dry when his house caught fire. But, the burning question here is this: can there be a political story somewhere in all this? Is it really silly to ask the question, did Cranick refuse to pay the tax out of ideology or some hateful anti-tax spite?

Morally, I think we can all agree that the fire department and the city of South Fulton were WRONG (!) to let the house burn because of principle. There are other ways to enforce a tax law than letting a family suffer with such a devastating loss. It is sad that some folks out there have to see this occurrence to open their eyes to the necessity of taxes. The anti-tax protestors don’t seem to get it about how their streets aren’t paved with “smaller government”, but with the tax burden that all citizens of all stripes share.

It is a harsh lesson indeed – too harsh in my opinion, but this speaks straight to the heart of the tax issue.

Share
You are protected by wp-dephorm: