A Second Look Rotating Header Image

liberal blog

Not Another Priest!

,,,,,,,

Quoted from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/06/pittsburgh-priest-child-pornography_n_1190716.html?ref=crime:

Pittsburgh Priest Denies Child Pornography Charges :Rev. Bartley Sorensen Arraigned


PITTSBURGH, Jan 6 (Reuters) – A Catholic priest pleaded not guilty on Friday to federal child pornography on suspicion of possessing thousands of images of young boys engaged in sex acts.

Rev. Bartley Sorensen, 62, former pastor of St. John Fisher Church in Churchill near Pittsburgh, arrived at his arraignment in U.S. District Court wearing hand and leg shackles and in the custody of U.S. Marshals.

He pleaded not guilty to two counts of receiving and possessing child pornography.

Child pornography aside, the church needs to do something REAL to stop these bizarre sex crimes, like publicly denounce the priest and support local law enforcement and the prosecution.

Priests are oathed to celebacy and this is just one more example of how celebacy doesn’t work. I can’t help but think about all the teen girls who do that promise ring thing and still wind up pregnant. You’d think that they would figure out the cause. Pious intentions are just so much wishful thinking. Priests should be allowed one night out a month to satisfy whatever it is they need to satisfy, then confess it off the next day. The strain of celebacy is too much for anybody.

But child porn is wrong no matter what, just saying.

Share

Forcing Women to Have Unwanted Children With the Disaster of Massive Overpopulation Looming is Very Nearsighted

Re: Texas Abortion Bill That Would Require Sonogram Before Procedure Poised To Become Law

AUSTIN, Tex (Reuters) – Women seeking an abortion would have to first get an ultrasound under a measure approved on Thursday by the Texas House of Representatives.

The proposal, the first significant bill considered by the House this year, was designated by Republican Governor Rick Perry as an emergency priority. A similar measure has already been approved by the state Senate.

Women would have to get an ultrasound between 24 and 72 hours before an abortion, the bill says. They would view the sonogram, hear an explanation of the image and listen to the heartbeat, if it is audible.

They want to break a woman’s heart after the rapist broke her nose, or worse. They want to rub a young teen’s pregnancy in her face after she has already had a traumatic emotional experience with her boyfriend and her parents. They are adding insult to injury, literally, in order to promote conservative ideology. They have no respect for the mother, or her life.

One interesting consideration that no one but me is considering right now is China and its massive overpopulation problem. The Chinese authorities force families to NOT have children under penalty of  imprisonment. I think the U.S. is the only country in the world that rewards large families with tax breaks. Looking forward to 2050, Texas could face some very awkward backpedaling when they realize that overcrowding, not abortion is the real problem. According to the Pew Research Center, the population of the U.S. will reach 438 million by the year 2050 most of the gain being Hispanic immigrants:

If current trends continue, the population of the United States will rise to 438 million in 2050, from 296 million in 2005, and 82% of the increase will be due to immigrants arriving from 2005 to 2050 and their U.S.-born descendants, according to new projections developed by the Pew Research Center.

These figures are a little dated, sure, but they emphasize a problem that will be impossible to deal with once it is here. What are the right-wing nutjobs going to do then? Shoot them all?

The balancing voice in the Texas legislature, the Democrats, have been largely ignored since the sweep of 2010, but they make a good point. If the pro-life crowd wants to force a woman to raise a child she doesn’t want, then those same right-wingers should help pay for the raising. From the source article:

Democrats tried unsuccessfully to add a series of amendments to the bill. One of those said that if the woman decided not to go through with the abortion, the state would have to pay for the college education for the child. Another, which also would have applied to cases in which the woman decided not to have the abortion, would have allowed women to get a court order to require the father of the child to get a vasectomy.

We all know the vasectomy thing won’t fly, but still, the father of the child, aka the rapist, should be forced to do something, right? After he gets out of prison, maybe? Anyway, the Texas Governor and Legislature says “nuts” to all that and full speed ahead! More births, please, and pass the potatoes (if there are any left)!

Share

“Weathervane” McCain Revisited (again)

Re: John McCain Vows To Make DADT Repeal Work (VIDEO)

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), the most outspoken adversary to the repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell,” appeared to change his tone on the move Thursday, saying that he would act “to make it work.”

Senator John Mccain (R)

Senator John McCain (R)

McCain, who was viewed as a noted ally in the battle to allow openly gay soldiers to serve in the armed forces before changing course last year, strongly opposed repealing the measure in the lame-duck congressional session and earlier last year, first disregarding the testimony of military leaders, then the findings of an extensive survey of servicemembers [sic], and finally lamenting the judgment of Congress last month.

But now that the repeal has been passed, McCain seems to be willing to commit himself to implementing the new system.

“I think I have to do everything I can to make sure that the [impact on the] morale, retention, recruitment and battle-effectiveness of the military is minimized as much as possible,” McCain said on Don Imus’s Fox Business program. “It is a law and I have to do whatever I can to help the men and women who are serving, particularly in combat, cope with this new situation. I will do everything I can to make it work.”

While this softer tone may be seen simply as another flip-flop indicative of the senator’s fluid political ideology, Jon Stewart appears convinced that McCain is filled with “old man crankiness” that will continue to appear throughout the 112th Congress.

This old man flip-flops much more often than John Kerry did, and much more than Bush did. When will the main stream media pick up on this and make it an issue? I mean, I have on many occasions ranted about Weathervane McCain – a “maverick” who’s opinion changes with the wind. You can read about it here, here, and here.

Well, the wind has blown again and McCain, who has been the most ardent foe of the repeal of DADT, is now for it with the disclaimer that he feels obligated to do all he can to limit the impact. What he doesn’t see, and what is so obvious to all service members from private to general, is that the repeal will have a positive impact on the military. Does this mean that he wants to limit the positive impact? Probably.

__________________________________________________________

Share
You are protected by wp-dephorm: