A Second Look Rotating Header Image

Environment

My Hero!

Re: Energy Legislation: Cantwell, Bingaman Strategize Ahead Of Meeting At White House, by Lucia Graves, HuffPost Reporting

The search for a legislative way forward on energy will continue Tuesday when Democrats reconvene to strategize ahead of a Wednesday energy meeting at the White House. Presenters from last Thursday’s Democratic caucus meeting, including Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) who laid out her CLEAR Act in a well-conceived video, will field questions from colleagues. Cantwell’s video, presented at a caucus meeting to decide what direction to take on energy legislation, describes the energy bill she is sponsoring with Susan Collins (R-Me.).

The CLEAR Act would spur green energy investment while avoiding regional disparities, according to a new study by the Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law. The legislation would cap national greenhouse gas emissions, auctioning off all allowances for emissions and then refunding 75 percent of federal revenues to taxpayers, using the other 25 percent to invest in green technologies.

I had high hopes for the Kerry-Lieberman-Graham climate change bill, but Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), the coward, decided that it was just way too liberal and took his ball and went home crying all the way about faulty climate science when everyone knows that big oil hired scientists to diss the real science and muddy the once clear waters of global warming truth. My heart sunk when the effort collapsed without GOP support. But the guys on the hill have to realize that any progressive measure will collapse if it depends on any GOP support at all to pass.

Now that my favorite Senator, Maria Cantwell (D-WA) has introduced legislation that would get the job done without cap-and-trade which was a faulty idea to begin with, my hopes are soaring again that we will begin to take real steps toward a clean energy future, instead of just giving it lip service like we have done for the past four decades. Cantwell’s plan limits carbon emissions. Cap-and-trade did not, and allowed big polluters to pay to keep on polluting.

Kudos to Senator Cantwell and Senator Bingaman!

Here’s the full video explaining how it works:

______________________________________________________________________

Share

Defunding Oil Rich Terrorist States is a Win-Win Situation (Video)

Support VoteVets.org

Re: Think Progress » Saudi-Funded Fox News Rejects Ad Arguing Against Middle East Oil Dependence

Last week, progressive veterans organization VoteVets.org released an ad arguing that “a clean energy climate plan would cut our dependence on foreign oil in half and cut oil profits for hostile nations.” The ad asserts that “every day, Iran gets $100 million richer selling oil around the world and peddling hate.”

While CNN and MSNBC have aired the ad, Fox News is refusing to do so. Politico reports Fox apparently found the ad “too confusing.”

Watch the ad:

What I find remarkable about this ad is that the folks at VoteVets.org have found the ultimate sanction against Iran that simultaneously helps fix the environment. Think about it. When we divert research and development funds away from big oil and to renewable forms of energy we can defund the Saudis, Iraq, Dubai, and Iran and all the other oil producing nations that support terrorism, in one form or another. Remember that almost all the 9/11 skyjackers were Saudi, not Iraqi. We can do that while cleaning our waterways, lessening the impact of offshore oil drilling, and setting up a beautiful future for our kids and grandkids.

But you can bet that if something clever and good for the working man comes along Fox News will refuse it. It will come to pass that the oil companies go the way of the horse and buggy. It is just a matter of time. There is only so much oil to be had and after they wring out every drop of it out of the earth, then what? SO, why not jump on the bandwagon and herald in a new age before that crisis hits?

In a statement issued to ThinkProgress, Richard Smith, a senior adviser to VoteVets who served in Afghanistan, says “the only confusing thing” is why Fox is rejecting the ad:

“There’s nothing confusing about the link between oil and terrorist funding, and even the most dyed-in-the-wool neocons agree on that point. The only confusing thing here is why FOX News would reject an ad that calls on Congress to defund our enemies by finding new sources of energy.

It’s unclear what Fox News’ motivations are. As Media Matters has documented, the network is a reliable source of misinformation on clean energy reform. Interestingly, Saudi oil tycoon Prince Alwaleed bin Talal owns a 7 percent stake in Fox News’ parent company News Corp, making him the largest shareholder outside the family of CEO Rupert Murdoch. But Murdoch has said the he is for a mandatory cap on carbon emissions and believes that Fox News ought to be covering the issue differently.

It is always very clear as to what Fox News’ motivations are. They probably coordinate with the GOP before they air any kind of ad, especially one that advocates clean air. They will misinform the public through omission. It’s like I’ve always said – the more you watch Fox News, the more misinformed you become.

___________________________________________________________________

Share

Coal Mining Gravy Train Finished (Photos)

Re: New Regulations Will Put an End to Mountaintop Mining | CommonDreams.org, by Suzanne Goldenberg, Published on Friday, April 2, 2010 by The Guardian/UK

The Obama administration effectively called time Thursday on one of the most destructive industries in America, proposing new environmental guidelines for mountaintop mining removal.

Mountain top removal. I’ve blogged this before, here, here, and here – and at other places inside A Second Look and outside as well. There is no bigger legal crime happening on a continual basis in America, except for the sale of cigarettes. Many peaks in the Appalachian Mountains have lost thousands of feet of height, over 2000 creeks and streams are lost from back fill which is sometimes composed of toxic materials, and the reclamation of the land afterwards more often than not concentrates on soil erosion by introducing fast growing, non-native grasses. Trees planted during reclamation often die due to the difficulty establishing a root system. All in all it is a legal raping of our American heritage.

The economics of mountaintop mining removal involve a highly destructive practice of blasting through hundreds of feet of mountaintop to get at thin but valuable seams of coal. The debris is removed to “valley fills”, and nearly 2,000 miles of streams in Appalachia have been buried beneath such fills.

MTR destroys forests – 2,200 square miles of forest by 2012 – and will mine over 1.4 million acres by the end of this year, an area the size of the state of Delaware.

Today’s guidelines mark a gradual tightening of conditions for mountain coal mining. Last week, the EPA took the rare step of vetoing a West Virginia mine that had already been granted a permit.

The EPA said the Spruce Number One mine, which was approved under George Bush administration in 2007, would bury up to seven miles of stream, and that toxic chemicals would hurt aquatic life. If approved, it would have been the largest mine in West Virginia.

The National Mining Association immediately condemned the move, saying it would cost jobs throughout Appalachia.

The Rainforest Action Network said: “The EPA has finally taken a leap to protect America’s mountains and drinking water.”

Jobs lost? Don’t buy into this BS. These mining operations move into a community and only hire a few unskilled laborers. The skilled heavy equipment operator and other skilled positions are imported. They come with the company. The mining companies themselves have turned a once booming jobs creating industry into another Bush-era jobs dumping industry when they switched to Mountain Top Removal. From wiki:

Historically in the U.S. the prevalent method of coal acquisition was underground mining which is very labor-intensive. In MTR, through the use of explosives and large machinery, more than two and a half times as much coal can be extracted per worker per hour than in traditional underground mines,[16] thus greatly reducing the need for workers. In Kentucky, for example, the number of workers has declined over 60% from 1979 to 2006 (from 47,190 to 17,959 workers)[17]. The industry overall lost approximately 10,000 jobs from 1990 to 1997, as MTR and other more mechanized underground mining methods became more widely used.[18] The coal industry asserts that surface mining techniques, such as mountaintop removal, are safer for miners than sending miners underground.[19]

The mining companies are responsible for the rampant job loss, not regulations.

It is high time that the EPA is doing their job again. They were handicapped by blind ideology for the last decade. Their hands were tied by high-level Bush appointees who denied environmental science and were sworn to a policy of bad governance.

OBTW. these MTR mines are so big they can be seen from space:

File:Hobet Mountaintop mine West Virginia 1984-09-18.jpg

The Hobet mine in West Virginia taken by NASA LANDSAT in 1994

File:Hobet Mountaintop mine West Virginia 2009-06-02.jpg

The Hobet mine in West Virginia taken by NASA LANDSAT in 2009

 __________________________________________________________________

Share
You are protected by wp-dephorm: