A Second Look Rotating Header Image

(all tags)

Want Some Real Relief?

Re: Rev. James Martin, S.J.: How To Find God: The Path of Belief, Rev. James Martin, S.J., Catholic priest and author, The Jesuit Guide to (Almost) Everything

How do I find God?

That question marks the starting point for all seekers. But, surprisingly, many books on spirituality often downplay or ignore them. Some writers assume you already believe in God, that you have already found God or that God is already part of your life. But it is somewhat ridiculous not to address those questions when it comes to the spiritual life. It would be like writing a book about swimming without first talking about how to float…

(snip)…None of these six paths is free from dangers…

(snip)…There is a more subtle danger for this group…

Of course. There seems to be an everlasting and all-consuming fear with finding a god(s). ( I add the “s” because this pertains to my pagan friends as well.) Faith has to be as hard and guilt ridden as possible or it won’t work. Nothing you can do is right, therefore you are always on your knees praying. There is no time in your life where you are innocent; guilt keeps you going back to church. There is no thought in your brain that is pure and without “sin”. The tiny smidge of telepathic prowess that we might enjoy is also corrupt.

Ridiculous!

How do I find god? To say that a god is hateful, mean, or spiteful would be an admission that one exists – and it does not. So, I find god(s) nonexistent. Life is much more pleasant this way.

—————————————————-

Share

“Weathervane” McCain Revisited (again)

Re: John McCain Vows To Make DADT Repeal Work (VIDEO)

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), the most outspoken adversary to the repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell,” appeared to change his tone on the move Thursday, saying that he would act “to make it work.”

Senator John Mccain (R)

Senator John McCain (R)

McCain, who was viewed as a noted ally in the battle to allow openly gay soldiers to serve in the armed forces before changing course last year, strongly opposed repealing the measure in the lame-duck congressional session and earlier last year, first disregarding the testimony of military leaders, then the findings of an extensive survey of servicemembers [sic], and finally lamenting the judgment of Congress last month.

But now that the repeal has been passed, McCain seems to be willing to commit himself to implementing the new system.

“I think I have to do everything I can to make sure that the [impact on the] morale, retention, recruitment and battle-effectiveness of the military is minimized as much as possible,” McCain said on Don Imus’s Fox Business program. “It is a law and I have to do whatever I can to help the men and women who are serving, particularly in combat, cope with this new situation. I will do everything I can to make it work.”

While this softer tone may be seen simply as another flip-flop indicative of the senator’s fluid political ideology, Jon Stewart appears convinced that McCain is filled with “old man crankiness” that will continue to appear throughout the 112th Congress.

This old man flip-flops much more often than John Kerry did, and much more than Bush did. When will the main stream media pick up on this and make it an issue? I mean, I have on many occasions ranted about Weathervane McCain – a “maverick” who’s opinion changes with the wind. You can read about it here, here, and here.

Well, the wind has blown again and McCain, who has been the most ardent foe of the repeal of DADT, is now for it with the disclaimer that he feels obligated to do all he can to limit the impact. What he doesn’t see, and what is so obvious to all service members from private to general, is that the repeal will have a positive impact on the military. Does this mean that he wants to limit the positive impact? Probably.

__________________________________________________________

Share

A Challenge from the Left would be Very Welcome (UPDATED)

UPDATE: Welcomed, but not by most Democrats!

Re: Obama Far More Protected From Primary Challenge Than Clinton: Poll, Sam Stein, stein@huffingtonpost.com | Huff Post Reporting

On Tuesday, polling numbers were released confirming that suspicion. According to a CNN/Opinion Research survey, a full 78 percent of Democrats want Obama to win the nomination for a second term in office — up five percent from late October. At roughly the same point in his presidency, only 57 percent of Democrats wanted Clinton to be re-nominated.

Maybe “Caver-in-Chief” Obama has 78%, and just maybe he in fact does up those numbers just before the election, but admittedly, he doesn’t have near as much support today as he did last January. Wouldn’t it be nice if those poll numbers showed that over 90% of Democrats wanted him to win the nomination, you know, like it was last year? Just saying.

Anyway, I’m still with the 12% or so who has jumped ship. I will not get pulled to the center.

_______________________________________________________________________
Original Post:

Re: Nader: I am Looking for Someone to Challenge Obama in 2012 | CommonDreams.org, Published on Thursday, December 9, 2010 by The Hill

Nader: I am Looking for Someone to Challenge Obama in 2012

by Elise Viebeck

Perennial third-party candidate Ralph Nader predicted on Wednesday that President Obama’s tax deal with Republicans will earn him a primary challenge in 2012.

[Consumer advocate, author, and Presidential candidate Ralph Nader in this file photo. Nader had harsh words for the president's approach to politics: "He has no fixed principles. He's opportunistic — he goes for expedience, like Clinton." (NBC News)]

Perennial third-party candidate Ralph Nader

Consumer advocate, author, and Presidential candidate Ralph Nader in this file photo. Nader had harsh words for the president’s approach to politics: “He has no fixed principles. He’s opportunistic — he goes for expedience, like Clinton.” (NBC News)

Though he wouldn’t rule out another presidential campaign himself, Nader, 76, said he hoped a new face would take up the progressive cause.

“I’m not foreclosing the possibility … There are just other things to do,” he said in an interview. “And it’s time for someone else to continue. I’ve done it so many times. When I go around the country, I’m telling people they need to find somebody.”

President Obama is betting on the idea that the progressive base of the Democratic Party will go ahead and vote en masse for him when the time comes even though he has bargained away almost the entire Democratic Party platform in just two years – in most cases before the bargaining began in earnest.  This has upset the progressive base. I think the overarching thing that has the Democrats upset with the President right now is that they thought Obama would be their knight in shining armor but has turned out to be a capitulating centrist. True, he campaigned with a strong progressive stance, but has since tacked toward the center, but wasn’t that his plan all along? I tried to tell everyone that Obama wasn’t a progressive here, here, herehere, here, and here …and more. As a matter of fact, Obama’s centrism has been one of my favorite subjects since his nomination. No “I told you so”, just facts. Many progressive Democrats, such as myself, would have loved a progressive leader like Dennis Kucinich, but alas, it did not come to pass.

But I’m still riding the progressive train. Nothing these politicians can do or say will derail my lifelong beliefs. I, and I’m sure many more like me, would love to see a real progressive candidate challenge Obama in 2012. Obama thinks that just because he will more than likely get the nomination again that we will automatically come over to him. He could not be more mistaken.

Share
You are protected by wp-dephorm: