A Second Look Rotating Header Image

January, 2010:

Obama Schools Republicans on the Box In Which They Put Themselves (Video)

Re: Obama Goes To GOP Lions’ Den — And Mauls The Lions, Sam Stein, Huffington Post, 01/29/10

President Obama traveled to a House Republican retreat in Baltimore on Friday and delivered a performance that was at once defiant, substantive and engaging.

Somehow, Obama knew beforehand that he could win the arguments that these Republicans are hurling at him in the media most everyday, arguments like, “The Republicans have a health care plan, but Pelosi ignored it,” and “Our health care plan would insure all Americans at half the cost.” He went in to the Q & A confidently. Obama took on the worst and most vitriolic talking points that the right could throw at him and volleyed back with clear and concise logic and fact. President Obama did more than that, he went to the heart of the tea bagger talking points that have Republican constituencies in such an uproar and shined a bright light of truth on them. You can read the entire transcript of the question and answer session here.

The President was asked by US Representative Jason Chaffetz (R) UT-3:

CONGRESSMAN CHAFFETZ: And I appreciate you being here.

I’m one of 22 House freshmen. We didn’t create this mess, but we are here to help clean it up. You talked a lot about this deficit of trust. There’s some things that have happened that I would appreciate your perspective on, because I can look you in the eye and tell you we have not been obstructionists. Democrats have the House and Senate and the presidency. And when you stood up before the American people multiple times and said you would broadcast the health care debates on C-SPAN, you didn’t. And I was disappointed, and I think a lot of Americans were disappointed.

You said you weren’t going to allow lobbyists in the senior-most positions within your administration, and yet you did. I applauded you when you said it — and disappointed when you didn’t.

You said you’d go line by line through the health care debate — or through the health care bill. And there were six of us, including Dr. Phil Roe, who sent you a letter and said, “We would like to take you up on the offer; we’d like to come.” We never heard a letter, we never got a call. We were never involved in any of those discussions.

And when you said in the House of Representatives that you were going to tackle earmarks — in fact, you didn’t want to have any earmarks in any of your bills — I jumped up out of my seat and applauded you. But it didn’t happen.

More importantly, I want to talk about moving forward, but if we could address –

The President explained to the Congressman that over the course of the health care debate most of it was actually on CSPAN. There were so many committees that it was impossible to cover them all live because of logistical difficulties. The best part comes toward the end of his answer when be skillfully pivots and begins addressing the vitriolic health care talking points that have been repeated by the right wing fringe from tea baggers to FOX Entertainment. (I refuse to call it news.) It was here that President Obama explained to the GOP audience the fact that they have boxed themselves in by working up their constituents in such an anti-Obama fervor, than any attempt by them to sit down with him for any meaningful discussion would be treated like treason to the party.

So all I’m saying is, we’ve got to close the gap a little bit between the rhetoric and the reality. I’m not suggesting that we’re going to agree on everything, whether it’s on health care or energy or what have you, but if the way these issues are being presented by the Republicans is that this is some wild-eyed plot to impose huge government in every aspect of our lives, what happens is you guys then don’t have a lot of room to negotiate with me.

I mean, the fact of the matter is, is that many of you, if you voted with the administration on something, are politically vulnerable in your own base, in your own party. You’ve given yourselves very little room to work in a bipartisan fashion because what you’ve been telling your constituents is, this guy is doing all kinds of crazy stuff that’s going to destroy America.

And I would just say that we have to think about tone. It’s not just on your side, by the way — it’s on our side, as well. This is part of what’s happened in our politics, where we demonize the other side so much that when it comes to actually getting things done, it becomes tough to do.

Now, the next step is for President Obama to attend a gathering of the Progressive Caucus and take their questions in the same manner. They throw as much vitriol at Obama as does his political opponents. The left attack Obama just as much as the right. The far left radicalize nuclear power, gay rights, Obama’s economic team, and a host of other issues. He must confront them next.

__________________________________________________________________

Share

From the eMail Bag: Fixing the Filibuster, Part 3

The Progress Report wrote:

Democracy Subverted


From: The Progress Report [progress@americanprogressaction.org]
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 10:10 AM
To: tom
Subject: Democracy Subverted

Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Red
CONGRESS

Democracy Subverted

Right-wing Subverts our Government

While it is now taken for granted than any major piece of legislation needs 60 votes to pass the Senate, this has not always been the case. Use of the filibuster– the minority’s tactic to halt action on a bill through endless debate –has skyrocketed in the past two decades, creating a de facto need for 60 votes to get anything done. It only requires 51 votes to pass any bill, but it takes 60 votes to invoke cloture to end debate and pass the bill. There are now double the number of cloture votes as there were a decade ago, and triple the numbers of 20 years ago As evidenced by the ongoing health care reform debate, the filibuster cripples the Senate’s ability to make progress. The filibuster also gives an undue amount of power to individual senators and allows them to exploit the process for their narrow interests, dictating policy outcomes. For instance, Sen. Joe Lieberman’s (I-CT) threat to filibuster health care reform forced the removal of the public option and the Medicare buy-in, despite their tremendous popularity. Moreover, as Rep. Jay Inslee (D-WA) noted, the filibuster removes electoral accountability by giving the losing party the ability to obstruct the winning party’s agenda. “It’s a system in which the minority benefits if the government fails, and the minority has the power to ensure failure,” Center for American Progress Action Fund fellow Matt Yglesias noted. Under President Obama, the Republican minority has repeatedly used and abused the practice of filibusters to obstruct the progressive agenda. The House was able to pass a health care reform bill with a robust public option, a clean energy and greenhouse gas pollution reduction bill to fight climate change, and acomprehensive financial regulatory reform bill with majority votes. However, because of the filibuster, each bill has languished in the Senate.

The Senate minority has the power to ensure the failure of our government. Never before in the history of the United States has a major political party set out to purposefully ensure the failure of the government. The right-wing nut jobs are forcing every bill in Congress to a 60 vote margin, and impossible bar to reach, and are using this tool to bring down the President.

This unprecedented use of the filibuster is obvious in its intent. The Republicans find themselves, as a result of the horrible abuses of power by President George Bush, in the smallest minority they have seen in several generations. They are striking back with everything they can throw at the Democrats from the filibuster, to heckling at town hall meetings, to employing their own cable television network (Fox) to propel their talking points and other proapganda. It is time that the Democratic majority fights back.

I have emailed my Senators urging them to convince the Democratic majority to employ the “Nuclear Option”, a parlimentary proceedure that is not a Senate rule, but has been used in the past to overcome filibusters. It is time to act. Here is my email to my two Senators.

The Senate Republicans are abusing the use of the filibuster. When they use the filibuster they are not honestly debating issues, instead they are obstinately refusing to listen to our side and voting “no” on any legislation no matter what concessions have been made to them. The result is that a small minority is holding Congress hostage until they get every single thing they want and that is not the way it is supposed to work.

It is time that Senate Democrats stood up to the right-wings insistence on a 60 vote supermajority and take direct aim at the abuse of the filibuster. To do this, I recommend the use of the so called “Nuclear Option”. If you can get a simple majority to vote on a point of order challenging the constitutionality of the filibuster, then the filibuster can be defeated. I strongly recommend this action. The Republican minority must realize that elections matter, and that they cannot suffer the Senate to abide by a minority that could conceivably be as small as one Senator. Please stop this abuse, convince the Democratic Senators to use the nuclear option.

Please do something, call or write your Senators.

_____________________________________________________

Technorati tags:  ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 

Share

Fixing the Filibuster, Part 2: Getting Help

Re:  Think Progress » White House Signals That It Will Fight Back Against GOP Abuse Of Filibuster, 01/24/10

…The number of Senate cloture votes, which require a supermajority of 60, “more than doubled — from 54 to 112 — from the 109th Congress (2005-2006) to the 110th (2007-2008), according to the Senate historical office.”

It is hard to imagine that people are just now starting to talk about how to fix the filibuster. How long has it been since the Republicans became the party of “no” and began this campaign to kill everything introduced by the Democrats? 2006?

This is a nice graphic illustrating the right-wing abuse of the filibuster since they lost so bad in 2006: 

Cloture_Voting,_U.S._Senate,_1947_to_2008 1

Cloture Voting, U.S. Senate 1947 to 2008

I know it is amazing, but there has actually been an itty bitty peep of support from the White House on fixing the filibuster. Vice President Joe Biden recently said, “No democracy has survived needing a supermajority.”

Biden’s communication director, Jay Carney weighed in by saying that the filibuster abuse has festered to the point that it is use has doubled in 20 years, tripled in 30. He states, “…it raises a legitimate question about whether this power is being used to protect the minority or merely to obstruct action and progress.” No duh. It sounds like he was born yesterday.

TV One’s Roland Martin also weighed in the fray by remarking about how there needs to be transparency in the cloture process – that Republicans need to be “called out” and made to explain to the people what they are doing and why. My sentiments exactly.

“The Republican strategy in the Senate is to turn 50 into 60, in other words no longer do you need a majority to carry the day in the Senate. You need 60 votes for everything because the Republicans are filibustering every single bill,” he said. “We need to call that out, and they need to explain to the American people whether throwing a wrench into everything at a time of national emergency is the appropriate policy. They want to win and election and take us back to the policies that got us into this mess in the first place.”

I am happy that the White House and others are finally seeing what we’ve seen all along, that the Republicans are laughing at us behind our backs because of our timidity and our insistence on bringing a knife to every gunfight we encounter. The right-wing’s bad behavior is off the charts and it is high time we acted.

I propose that we use the Nuclear Option to declare all the right-wing filibusters unconstitutional on the grounds that they are invoking the maneuver promote their ideology and gain political advantage in Washington.

Nuclear Option explained:

In U.S. politics, the “nuclear option” is an attempt by a majority of the United States Senate to end a filibuster by invoking a point of order to essentially declare the filibuster unconstitutional which can be decided by a simple majority, rather than seeking formal cloture with a supermajority of 60 senators. Although it is not provided for in the formal rules of the Senate, the procedure is the subject of a 1957 parliamentary opinion and has been used on several occasions since. The term was coined by Senator Trent Lott (Republican of Mississippi) in 2005.

__________________________________________________________________

Share
You are protected by wp-dephorm: