A Second Look Rotating Header Image

November, 2009:

Today’s GOP is Smaller than Ever, Screams to Remain Relevant

Re: Today’s GOP is both united and divided – washingtonpost.com, By Jon Cohen and Dan Balz, Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, November 30, 2009

The Republican rank and file is largely in sync with GOP lawmakers in their staunch opposition to efforts by President Obama and Democrats to enact major health-care legislation, but a new Washington Post poll also reveals deep dissatisfaction among GOP voters with the party’s leadership as well as ideological and generational differences that may prove big obstacles to the party’s plans for reclaiming power.

Republicans and GOP-leaning independents are overwhelmingly negative about Obama and the Democratic Party more broadly, with nearly all dissatisfied with the administration’s policies and almost half saying they are “angry” about them. About three-quarters have a more basic complaint, saying Obama does not stand for “traditional American values.” More than eight in 10 say there is no chance they would support his reelection.

My question is this, why do journalists and TV pundits talk about the Republican Party as if it were just as large and relevant as the Democratic Party? There is only one place in this entire article that mentions how small the GOP has become. It is in the middle of the second page (online) and surrounded by parentheses as if it were something injected as a side note or just for your information:

Almost three-quarters of Republicans and GOP-leaners identify themselves as “conservative” on most issues, up sharply from a couple of years ago. (In some part, the rise is attributable to fewer Americans calling themselves Republicans; with an average of just 22 percent in Post polls this year saying so, the lowest number in polls since 1981.)

Oh by the way, 78% of voting Americans are NOT Republicans.

But the right-wing journalists insist that what they do or what they say is just as relevant as the majority opinion without any disclaimer about just how many of them there are. The news media cover the small, but loud, tea-bag protests as if they were just springing up everywhere as a natural occurrence automatically because of the crazy hyperbole that Obama is a socialist or that their grandma has to die. The reporters proudly over-estimate the numbers of the crowd and unapologetically talk about the insane posters and signs as if they had something legitimate to say. And if you are thinking that, well, the squeaky wheel gets the grease, then just think back to when there were massive marches and demonstrations to end the war in Iraq. That particular loudly squeaking wheel got no grease at all.

Now, the Washington Post interviews a few right-wing freaks in Colorado and suddenly their opinion is supposed to be some sort of new, awesome truth, when if fact, it is the minority opinion.

In the Colorado focus groups, Republican voters expressed strong concerns about the first year of the Obama presidency. Pam Hyde, 53, who works at an elementary school, said new government spending worries her. “We’ll never recover from that,” she said. “I can’t imaging recouping the money that he’s proposing to spend. Unbelievable.”

As a matter of comparison, did the interviewer ask her if she was aware that the cost of war in Iraq and Afghanistan this year would almost double the price of the health care bill for one year? No. Did he ask her if she was aware that we spend ten times the amount of the health care reform on the Defense Department every year? No. The interviewer let her words just hang out there as if they meant something. Did the interviewer ask if she was aware that a third of the stimulus bill was in the form of tax cuts for the middle class? Sadly, no.

What the right wing discomfort boils down to is that there is a black Democrat in the White House. There is nothing more substantial being said or inferred. It is pure Bracknophobia, nothing else.

In the immortal words of The Daily Show’s Jon Stewart, “you lost, it’s supposed to taste like a sh*t taco”. (This quote is at the 3:31 mark.)

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Baracknophobia – Obey
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political Humor Health Care Crisis

More and more conservatives are leaning toward the hard right-wing fringe, being upset about Obama, and they are floundering, desperately, to be heard. Of Republicans:

On fiscal issues, the percentage calling themselves conservative has soared to more than eight in 10. More striking is that a majority considers themselves to be “very conservative” on fiscal issues, up about 20 points in two years. On social issues, two-thirds of Republicans say they are conservative, and about a third of Republicans say they are very conservative. Overall, about two in 10 are both fiscally conservative and moderate-to-liberal on social issues.

Let them trend to the right. This is the best thing to ever happen to the Democratic Party, well, that and Sarah Palin.

[Palin1.jpg]

Caricature of Sarah Palin

_______________________________________________________

Share

The AP Thinks Legislation Requires 60 Votes

Re: Senate Opens Health Care Debate: Dem Coalition Fracturing Already, by RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR | 11/29/09 10:51 AM | AP

(snip) Reid wants to finish by Christmas; he may not get to.

He’s hoping that Democrats will stick together on procedural matters, where Senate rules require 60 votes to advance. That would allow for different views to be heard on the underlying questions. But such an accommodation might not always be possible.

Senate rules require 60 votes to advance? No, Republicans require 60 votes to advance. There would be no requirement for 60 votes on a cloture vote to end debate if Republicans do not filibuster. The fault here lies with the obstructionist Republicans standing in the way. The fault is not a fractured Democratic Party. The AP writer goes on to say:

For example, the National Right to Life to Committee says unless there are big changes, it will count the procedural motion to allow a final up-or-down vote on the legislation as tantamount to a vote on abortion.

Who gives a f**k about what the National Right to Life to Committee says? They can’t vote on the floor of the Senate. That’s no more of a threat than any other lobby has attempted. Remember the study heralded by AHIP last October that they commissioned from Price Waterhouse Coopers about what the Senate bill would do to premium prices? Remember how PWC backed away and leaked it out that AHIP had asked for a study on only certain parts of the bill? Well, This National Right to Life has no more claim on this bill than AHIP.

This is just wild hair-on-fire speculation propelled by the often right-wing slant from the Associated Press. The AP needs to go back to civics class. Sixty votes is only necessary on a cloture vote if there is a filibuster on moving to the vote for passage. If the Obstructionist Republicans, the party of no, would do what is right for America, we would not be concerned with 60 votes.

__________________________________________________-

Share

Thank The Troops By Bringing Them Home

Re:  Jon Soltz: Thanks… Again And Again And Again, Posted by Jon Soltz, Co-Founder of VoteVets.org, served as a Captain in Operation Iraqi Freedom, Posted: November 26, 2009 08:22 AM

End the wars

Jon was speaking of the many TV commercials Thursday, Thanksgiving day that thanked the troops.

At the same time, I can’t help but think that some young grunt is watching these videos for maybe the fourth or fifth time from a TV that the USO set up in the warzone. And, while he’ll strap on his rifle and go whenever called, part of him is thinking “How many more Thanksgivings am I going to have to watch these videos from over here? If you want to thank me, let me eat some turkey at home. Let me see my girlfriend and parents and friends for more than just short stints at home. Don’t you have someone who can rotate in here for me so I can stop doing these tours for a while?”

This is my point in my previous post, It’s President Obama, Not McCain, or McMorris Rodgers, I stated:

We have been undulated with calls to help military families since Bush led the invasion of Afghanistan back in 2001, and then turned the nation toward a straw bogy-man, illegally, in Iraq. I support helping military families being a veteran myself, an Army retiree, and with a service member in our family who completed a tour in Iraq a short time ago. But, this smacks of wrapping a political agenda inside the flag. She says nothing about the deep scars that may be left for decades to come inside our military and their families due to continual wars that were began by the right-wing and the repetitive rotations in and out of the theater of operations. Yes, let’s support them while they are called up once again and let’s enable them to be called over and over because of that support.

The point is that it is starting to sound more like McCarthyism-type raving and not as sincere as in years past. It is almost like a futuristic movie where “Big Brother” propaganda continually plays on huge TV screens at city street intersections, “Thank the Troops, Thank the Troops”. What is really meant is “Support the War, Support the War”.

This propaganda campaign is very effective at delaying the end and subsequently ensuring more profits for arms manufacturers. The more we support and thank the troops publically, the more we propel the propaganda and enable even more war. There should be commercials on TV during Thanksgiving Day football that states, let’s really help the troops and end the war. Soltz was appreciative of the good wishes for the troops, but added, “But at a certain point, for those there for yet another holiday, the thanks start to ring a bit more hollow.”

We need to hurry and get to an end state that can be an acceptable/tolerable status quo, then leave both Afghanistan and Iraq for good. It is time we get fed up with war.

Get hold of your State’s Congressional delegation and tell them to bring our boys and girls home. Give them some rest and relaxation. Our forces are stretched to the breaking point. If something happened on our mainland, there would not be sufficient forces to deal with that contingency. Let them defend our country from here – a strategic military maneuver.

If you really want to thank the troops, then end the war.

_________________________________________________

Share
You are protected by wp-dephorm: