A Second Look Rotating Header Image

July, 2009:

A Second Look | Senator Max Baucus (R-MT), May Be A “Birther” (UPDATED)

via Baucus: “No Idea” How I’ll Vote On Sotomayor.

Senator Max Baucus, possible "Birther"

Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.), already under scrutiny by progressive Democrats, has created new cause for apprehension by saying he’s not sure he will vote for the president’s Supreme Court nominee.

Asked by The Hill whether he would support Judge Sonia Sotomayor, Baucus twice said he was still undecided.

“I have no idea,” Baucus said. “I haven’t paid any attention and I haven’t announced … I’ve been so busy with healthcare. It’s under consideration. I’ll certainly know when I vote, but right now I can’t tell you.”

This is the exact same kind of answers that Republican congresspersons are spouting when asked about the birth certificate. The Hill should have asked him at the same time if he thought Obama was a U.S. citizen. His answer might have been, “I’m not sure. I haven’t personally seen a birth certificate. The President should produce a birth certificate to put this to rest.” Baucus should be included in Bill Posey’s nine-member Birther Caucus.

The article goes on to explain that Baucus and other Republicrats (confused Republicans that run for office as a Democrats) like Ben Nelson of Nebraska issued wishy-washy statements about their votes for Sotomayor after the National Rifle Association gave Sotomayor a bad report card on gun legislation. Her decisions were clearly followed precedence and concurred with other Republican-appointed judges.

The National Rifle Association has very little to do with rifles. Its primary purpose is to get Republicans elected/reelected using gun control as a wedge issue.

Baucus and others should be honest with themselves and announce that they are Republicans. That would be better for the Democratic Party, even if it means losing control of the Senate. The Democratic Party gets much bad press when these Republicrats waffle on President Obama’s appointees. It is very embarrassing.

My message to Senator Baucus? If you are a Democrat, then vote like one.

UPDATE, 07/31/09, 2:30 PM

Sen. Baucus, after saying he didn’t know how he would vote, has now committed to supporting Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor.

“I have long said that to be a Supreme Court Justice a person must meet three main criteria: personal integrity, professional competence, and a view of important issues that is within the mainstream of contemporary judicial thought,” Baucus said in a statement. “After personally meeting Judge Sotomayor, thoroughly analyzing her judicial record, and reviewing her nomination hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Judge Sotomayor unquestionably meets each of these criteria. Thus, I am proud to support her nomination and will vote to confirm her as a Justice to the United States Supreme Court.”

He has changed his mind since this morning. His first instinct was to doubt President Obama’s nomination, but later decided it was not politically advantageous to oppose her. He could have said this in the first place and avoided all the scrutiny.

Share

A Second Look | Obama Re-Tooled Speech, Ditched The Public Plan

via As House and Senate Negotiate, Obama Fine-Tunes His Pitch | 44 | washingtonpost.com.

President Obama on Wednesday will take his plea for health-care reform to audiences in North Carolina and southwest Virginia, armed with a bullet-point-style message that his aides are hoping will be persuasive.

The re-tooled pitch highlights eight ways that, the White House says, health-care consumers would be treated better by insurance companies if reform efforts pass. It isn’t exactly prime sound-bite material — the catchiest title we could come up with is ‘Eight No’s, an Extension and a Guarantee,’ which doesn’t exactly roll off the tongue.

But the message is the latest attempt by the White House to cut through dense policy discussions in a way that busy, distracted citizens can understand.

The message cuts through thick discussion – and totally looses sight of the public option. Go to the link above and read over the eight points. I’m not going to copy them here.

There is something in addition to this that is bothering me. In recent days, the President has been arguing for the public plan in a way that weakens the pro stance. He has been putting the public option out there as merely competition for insurance companies, rather than a viable system to provide care for those who cannot afford it. He is saying that the only reason to create a public health plan is to reign in excesses by insurance companies, to ensure that they cannot game the system. But that is not the real reason to create public health care for all, and it looks as though Obama is purposefully weakening the argument for a public plan.

I keep trying to remind myself and others that Obama is not a progressive Democrat. He never was. The image of Obama as a progressive is something that the progressive base has projected on him, something he admitted was happening in his book entitled Audacity of Hope, and this progressive thing is something that he has yet to attempt to dispel. President Obama is a pragmatic centrist. He is so pragmatic that he will accept a health care “reform” bill that only slaps the back of the hands of the insurance industry a little and then ignores the pleas of the uninsured – just to have compromise. No, sadly, Obama is not a progressive. We did not elect Dennis Kucinich. Hindsight shows us, in this fight, maybe we should have.

I wrote the White House a memo today with the contact form that is on the website. I sent the letter hoping it will make a difference however short this falls from his desk. Hoping. Here’s my memo:

I just read an article in the Washington Post entitled, “As House and Senate Negotiate, Obama Fine-Tunes His Pitch”. The article discusses eight points that President Obama will now use to fine tune his pitch for health care reform. The president is to unveil this new eight-point strategy today in Raleigh, NC.

I am extremely upset about these points he is using to fine tune his plan because not one of the eight points mentions a public plan. I am so angry I can bite through a nail. President Obama is going to loose his base if he gives away the public option, and I will be one of them. I have never given so much time and money to a presidential campaign in my life, (56 y/o) as I did to the Obama campaign. If he throws away our best chance at public health care to please the lobbyists, I will never support him again.

Please, Mr. President, stand tough. When the sun goes down today another 14,000 will loose access to health care. We must have a public option, not for competition in the insurance market place, but because poor people – immigrants, farm workers, day laborers – who can’t buy insurance get sick too.

Share

A Second Look | CBO Slams Health Industry Figures

via Democrats cite CBO to boost healthcare case – Yahoo! News.

The CBO [Congressional Budget Office] report estimated only about 10 million to 11 million people would sign up for the public option by 2019, far fewer than the 103 million cited in another analysis by the Lewin Group. The Lewin Group is part of Ingenix, a wholly-owned subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group.

The CBO report also estimated the Democratic proposal would boost enrollment in employer-based plans by about 12 million people because of the mandate for individuals to be insured.

Republicans often cite Lewin Group analysis to make their point that millions of people would lose their current health coverage if the proposed overhaul became law. But the CBO disputed the group’s conclusions.

“We anticipate that our estimate of the number of enrollees in the public plan would be substantially smaller than the Lewin Group’s, even if we assumed that all employers would have that option,” CBO said.

Pelosi and other Democratic leaders said their bill would move the healthcare system in a new direction after years of “immoral” profits by insurance companies — an accusation the insurance industry sharply rejected.

“For every dollar our country spends on health care, less than one penny goes toward health plans’ profits. In order to make health care more affordable for families and small businesses, we need to focus on the other 99 cents,” said Robert Zirkelbach, a spokesman for America’s Health Insurance Plans, which represents the industry.

The CBO has just debunked the Republican talking points concerning the cost of a public option – talking points like “a public option will drive over 100 million to government insurance”. Those talking points came from the Lewin Group – a think tank that is funded 100% by United Health.

Also – Robert Zirkelbach of AHIP says that only a penny of every dollar given to the health insurance industry is actually profit. He fails to mention that a trillion pennies add up to $10 billion. Besides, Zirkelbach’s figures are only good for 2008, a year in which the economy, and stock prices, tanked. A report released by the SEIU in August of 2008 tells the real story:

According to a new report examining financial trends in the insurance industry, the combined profits of the nation’s largest insurance companies and their subsidiaries increased by over 170 percent between 2003 and 2007.

If Democrats in Congress believe this B.S. from insurance lobbyists like AHIP and the Lewin Group, then we are doomed. We need to elect better Democrats.

Share
You are protected by wp-dephorm: