A Second Look Rotating Header Image

February 21st, 2009:

A Second Look | No Longer A Forgotten War

The Progress Report wrote:

Swat Valley near Islamabad

No Longer A Forgotten War

From: The Progress Report [progress@americanprogressaction.org]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 9:43 AM
To: tomc2322
Subject: No Longer A Forgotten War
COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH: The deployment of these additional troops is part of Obama’s commitment to make Afghanistan “the center of our global counterinsurgency campaign.” Part of this strategy requires building, training, and equipping the Afghan National Army. The new troops authorized by Obama will have a “dual mission” to “help double the size of the Afghan Army to 134,000 by the end of 2011 and provide security in Afghan communities, which increasingly are falling under Taliban control.” Accompanying Obama’s troop surge should be a corresponding civilian surge; McKiernan has already “pressed for more help from civilian agencies, both within the U.S. government and from other countries.” As the Center for American Progress has written, actions in Afghanistan also have an impact on Pakistan, a country with nuclear weapons and a far larger population. Obama has recognized this fact and appointed Richard Holbrooke to be the Special Envoy to both Afghanistan and Pakistan. Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair has acknowledged that “no improvement in Afghanistan is possible without Pakistan taking control of its border areas and improving governance.” This week, the Pakistani government made a concession to local Taliban leaders and agreed to enforce strict religious law in the Swat Valley, a resort near the Afghan border that was once known as the “Switzerland of Pakistan.” After being ousted from Afghanistan in 2001, the Taliban has rebuilt strength in Pakistan; this recent Swat deal is similar to the ones struck in 2004, 2006, 2008, which ended up creating greater safe havens. Additionally, U.S. missile strikes on suspected al Qaeda hideouts in Pakistan have been extraordinarily effective in “tracking and killing high-value terrorist suspects,” but they have “not helped to prevent the spread of jihadist sympathies in the tribal regions and beyond, nor has it slowed the stream of militants and material into Afghanistan,” national security analyst Micah Zenko notes. “In fact, according to Pakistani intelligence reports, refugees from Afghanistan have flocked to the Taliban by the hundreds to avenge the drones’ killings of innocent civilians.”

Swat Valley, "Switzerland of Pakistan"


This is the approach that should have been used in Iraq as I have said all along. Rumsfeld and the rest of the neo-nutjobs could not have been more stupid if they had tried. A very large civilian agency “push package” should have been ready to land in Iraq and begin operations in the secure Green Zone. Representatives from various vital agencies should have been activated to man the day by day operations of an interim government in Iraq. Civilian agencies in Afghanistan is also a must. This will relieve the military of a mission that they are not trained to do.

Women under sharia law must hide their faces

Everyone must remember that the area of the Swat Valley in question is not along the Afghanistan/Pakistan border, but much deeper into Pakistan, near Islamabad. The Taliban is taking over the region and that can’t be good news. The problem I have with concessions to
the Taliban by the Pakistani government involves the treatment of the women, to whom this is clearly pointed. When Muslims speak of strict sharia law, they speak of “decency police” and rules on women that take them back to the stone age. Pakistan is once again placating the Taliban. It is compounding our efforts in Afghanistan to form a solid government.

When Afghan civilians are flocking to the Taliban by the hundreds we are not winning hearts and minds. Diplomacy with the Taliban is critical.

,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,

Share

A Second Look | Obama: Tax Cuts Will Be Felt By April 1 (VIDEO)

via Obama: Tax Cuts Will Be Felt By April 1 (VIDEO).

WASHINGTON — The notoriously slow Congress passed the $787 billion economic stimulus package in a matter of weeks. President Barack Obama signed it into law less than one month into his presidency.

So, just how soon will Americans start reaping the benefits of tax cuts in it?

By April 1, according to the president.

(snip)

He said the Treasury Department has begun directing employers to reduce the amount of taxes withheld from people’s paychecks in accordance with the new law, and that in six weeks, a typical family will start taking home at least $65 more every month.


The stimulus bill is hardly about tax cuts, but this article seems to gloat in the fact that the tax cuts will be initiated so quickly. Relax, Repugs, this doesn’t prove anything. Tax cuts are still the weakest form of stimulus spending only earning $.33 to every dollar spent. Build a school and you have earnings stretching years into the future. Spending of this nature earns $1.73 to every $1.00 spent. Here is what this author wants us to remember:

Obama’s expensive and ambitious package of federal spending and tax cuts is designed to revive the economy and save or create 3.5 million or more jobs. It will inject a sudden boost of cash into transportation, education, energy and health care, while aiming to help recession victims through tax cuts, extended unemployment benefits and short-term health insurance assistance. It also will add to a rapidly growing national debt.

The words expensive and ambitious are upfront so they will stick in your memory. There is no mention that the failed trickle-down deregulating policies of G. W. Bush got us into this mess and that a giant stimulus is necessary to help get us out. There is no mention of the fact that Republican deregulation is at the heart of the recession and that Republican ideology has almost sent the entire worlds’ economy into a tailspin. The real kicker is that the article ends with a quote from another Republican about Democratic borrow and spend. The AP loves to do this – leave you with the Republican view – without apology or correction of the statement’s falsehood.

“We can’t borrow and spend our way back to prosperity,” Camp said.

Borrow and spend. The Republicans love to accuse the Democrats of what they do so that when the Democrats point fingers they look like they are being childish. The truth is, Democrats have complained about Republican, mainly Bush, borrowing and spending to finance the illegal occupation of Iraq for the last six years. You’d think  Liz Sidoti of the AP would have mentioned all the Republican borrowing and spending, but no.

Share
You are protected by wp-dephorm: