A Second Look Rotating Header Image

February 15th, 2009:

A Second Look: Obama On Republicans: ‘I’m An Optimist, Not A Sap’

Obama On Republicans: ‘I’m An Optimist, Not A Sap’

In an interview with columnists aboard Air Force One, President Obama talked about what he learned from the stimulus battle. Pronouncing himself impressed with his team for moving the legislation through Congress so quickly, he said the plan wasn’t everything he wanted but was still a “very good start on moving things forward.”

President Obama Exits Air Force One

As for his experience with congressional Republicans, the president said, “I made every effort to reach out to Republicans early to get their input and to get their buy-in. I think that there were some senators and House members who have a sincere philosophical difference with the idea of any government role in boosting demand in the economy. They don’t believe in [John Maynard] Keynes and they’re still fighting FDR … I think we can disagree without being disagreeable on that front.”

He is making a stand with the Republican minority by pointing back to the highly publisized gatherings and meetings with GOP leaders. Those meetings are on record. They are firmly locked in the publics mind as efforts by the President to reach across the isle. Republicans cannot deny those attempts although they have tried and it sounded silly, especially coming from Senator McCain. Every time McCain opens his mouth railling against the President, he sounds like a grumpy old man and a sore loser.

The GOP’s insistence on a party-line vote on the stimulus reinforces the image of obstructionism and is in direct contrast to a stimulus bill that is very popular among the voters. The joyous way in which they danced and celebrated their out-of-touch ideology as evidenced by the last two elections cycles may turn out to be a self-inflicted wound.

This is a good little article that promotes President Obama’s image of pragmatism.

Looking more forward, the president also outlined his priorities for the rest of the year:

“My priorities for the rest of the year. Number one is to get the right structure for the successor to TARP; spending the $300-some billion that has already been authorized as wisely as possible, and injecting transparency and trust into the financial system. Having a housing program that provides relief to people who are at risk of losing their homes. Financial regulations that ensure that the crisis doesn’t happen again. A innovative and aggressive push for health care reform that focuses not just on access but also on costs, and trying to just provide relief to working families. And a push for an energy policy that puts us on a path to sustainability.”

,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Share

A Second Look: Torture Report Could Be Trouble For Bush Lawyers | Newsweek Periscope | Newsweek.com

Quoted from http://www.newsweek.com/id/184801:

Torture Report Could Be Trouble For Bush Lawyers | Newsweek Periscope | Newsweek.com

By Michael Isikoff | NEWSWEEK
Published Feb 14, 2009
From the magazine issue dated Feb 23, 2009

John Yoo, Torture Memo Author

An internal Justice Department report on the conduct of senior lawyers who approved waterboarding and other harsh interrogation tactics is causing anxiety among former Bush administration officials. H. Marshall Jarrett, chief of the department’s ethics watchdog unit, the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), confirmed last year he was investigating whether the legal advice in crucial interrogation memos “was consistent with the professional standards that apply to Department of Justice attorneys.” According to two knowledgeable sources who asked not to be identified discussing sensitive matters, a draft of the report was submitted in the final weeks of the Bush administration. It sharply criticized the legal work of two former top officials—Jay Bybee and John Yoo—as well as that of Steven Bradbury, who was chief of the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) at the time the report was submitted, the sources said. (Bybee, Yoo and Bradbury did not respond to multiple requests for comment.)

I’ll bet they didn’t! How would they respond? (1) I haven’t seen the report. (2) Everything we did was legal (’cause we said so). (3) Talk to Mukasey. (4) Everything we did was legal (’cause the Prez said so). (5) Which version of the big lie do you want to hear (since we are the world champion bull-shitters)?

But then–Attorney General Michael Mukasey and his deputy, Mark Filip, strongly objected to the draft, according to the sources. Filip wanted the report to include responses from all three principals, said one of the sources, a former top Bush administration lawyer. (Mukasey could not be reached; his former chief of staff did not respond to requests for comment. Filip also did not return a phone message.) OPR is now seeking to include the responses before a final version is presented to Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. “The matter is under review,” said Justice spokesman Matthew Miller.

They strongly objected to the draft? Wow. I strongly object to torture. Of course they objected. The ethics watchdogs are coming up with a paper that may rename the whole “rough interrogations” policy to what it really is – torture and that report may get them in a pickle with the same law that they swore to uphold. Ha! “Excuse me, sir, but I strongly object to the truth. It might harm my position here.”

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Share
You are protected by wp-dephorm: