A Second Look Rotating Header Image

February 3rd, 2009:

A Second Look: DN!: Rep. Kaptur Urges Homeowners to Stay in Foreclosed Homes

Democracy Now! wrote:

DN!: Rep. Kaptur Urges Homeowners to Stay in Foreclosed Homes


From: Democracy Now! [outreach@democracynow.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 12:50 PM
To: Democracy Now! Daily Digest
Subject: DN!: Rep. Kaptur Urges Homeowners to Stay in Foreclosed Homes//Sri Lankan Military Intensifies Offensive Against LTTE
TODAY’S DEMOCRACY NOW!:

* Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-OH) Urges Homeowners to Stay in Foreclosed Homes *

After an $850 billion bailout for Wall Street and another $25 billion for the auto industry, struggling homeowners still await large-scale government assistance. The Obama administration says it’s working out the details of its plan to stem foreclosures. In the absence of government action so far, some are taking action on the local level. In Michigan, Wayne County Sheriff Warren Evans announced Monday he won’t enforce sales of foreclosed homes. And in Ohio, Rep. Marcy Kaptur is encouraging homeowners facing foreclosures to stay in their homes. Meanwhile, the government-backed mortgage giant Fannie Mae has agreed to restructure mortgages after a campaign led by one of its biggest critics, the Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America.


Listen/Watch/Read
http://www.democracynow.org/2009/2/3/rep_marcy_kaptur_d_oh_urges

We need more of what Rep. Marcy Kaptur is doing.

,,,,,,

Share

A Second Look: Senate GOP blocks extra $25B in stimulus package

via Senate GOP blocks extra $25B in stimulus package.

By ANDREW TAYLOR, Associated Press Writer
Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Senate Republicans on Tuesday blocked Democrats from adding $25 billion for highways, mass transit, and water projects to President Barack Obama’s economic recovery program. Already unhappy over the size of the measure, Republicans insisted additional infrastructure projects be paid for with cuts elsewhere in the bill.

But the Democratic amendment garnered 58 votes, just shy of the supermajority needed under Senate budget rules, and many more efforts to increase the measure’s size are sure to follow.

Here is another example of the Associate Press skewing the truth to either inflame the right-wing bottom feeders or to glorify their out of touch Republican policies.

The Senate GOP blocked another good idea. Of course the AP isn’t going to say it that way. If they mention Democrats it would be to say that the Democrats failed to pass the amendment.

Why can’t the AP an other Main Stream Media call these things for what they are? The GOP blocked the Democratically sponsored amendment because of ideology. Instead of passing something that would immediately create tons of jobs, such as infrastructure projects, they would rather give the contracting companies a tax cut. What good would a tax cut do a company if it can’t sell it’s products?

Just once I would like to see the AP and others tell the story like this:

Today, the Senate GOP  blocked an extra $25 billion to the stimulus package – an important and sorely needed  boost to the construction industry for mass transit, highways, and water projects. Why they did it isn’t exactly clear, but one Republican Senator, to remain anonymous, said that there was already too much spending on job creation and not enough “incentives” for company owners. The GOP was said to be holding out for more tax cuts, an idea that has seen it’s time pass.

Sadly, that story – which is the truth – would never get printed by the Associated Press.

Share

A Second Look: Just Foreign Policy News, February 2, 2009

Just Foreign Policy wrote:

Just Foreign Policy News, February 2, 2009


From: Just Foreign Policy [info@justforeignpolicy.org]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 5:08 PM
To: Tom Chambless
Subject: Just Foreign Policy News, February 2, 2009
Summary: 1) Obama seems unlikely to widen war in Afghanistan
Anne Gearan, Associated Press, Saturday, January 31, 2009; 12:00 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/31/AR2009013100355.html


1) Obama has done little since taking office to suggest he will significantly widen the war against the Taliban, writes Anne Gearan for AP. Obama said he wants to add troops to turn back the Taliban, but has not gone beyond the 30,000 additional forces already under consideration by the previous administration. Those troops would double the U.S. presence, but amount to a “finger in the dike,” Gearan says.


Fourteen days. Obama has been in office fourteen days. Two weeks!

Obama has also done little since taking office to cure cancer, invent warp drive, and solve the Great Train Robbery.

Everyone just chill out.

You know, this is a trade mark of the Associated Press. They are mere alarmists doing whatever they can do to help promote the right-wing agenda. This little article is a scare tactic designed to add fuel to the fire of the right-wing talk machine. The Associated Press cleverly disguises their fake alarmism as main stream news. The statement charging that Obama “has not gone beyond” the 30,000 additional troops is insinuating that common wisdom says he must deploy more than that number to be effectual. The truth is the verdict is still out on how much effect that number of additional troops will have.

Debunking the AP:

Remember, the 30,000 troops aforementioned is an increase, not total. The Bush administration may have considered adding troops in Afghanistan, but Bush did not ever mention removing that many troops from Iraq to accomplish that mission. The Associated Press leads you to believe Obama is just following through with Bush’s plan – not true. In September 2008, Bush ordered half of the 8000 troops scheduled to rotate out of Iraq to be redeployed to Afghanistan – in February 2009, after he leaves office. This addition of only four thousand troops, far less than Obama’s number, was his “quiet surge” plan. Now, after January 20th, that ball is in Obama’s court.

Debunking the AP’s Petraeus mystique:

Also ahead is Army Gen. David Petraeus’ wider survey of both the Afghan and Iraq wars and other issues in the Middle East. Petraeus, military architect of the troop increase of U.S. troops in Iraq, is not likely to recommend a similar one in Afghanistan.

The Associated Press talks like the great General is about to give an edict from on high and the world will quake. President Obama will guide General Petraeus and the good General will fight the war(s) in accordance with Obama’s policies, guidelines, and objectives.

,,,,,,,

Share
You are protected by wp-dephorm: