A Second Look Rotating Header Image

January, 2009:

A Second Look: Shameful Corporate Greed

The Progress Report wrote:

Shameful Corporate Greed

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY)


From: The Progress Report [progress@americanprogressaction.org]
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 9:37 AM
To: tomc2322
Subject: Shameful Corporate Greed
CONGRESS — FLASHBACK: McCONNELL SAID STIMULUS WON’T HAVE ANY PROBLEM ‘GETTING OVER 60 VOTES’: On Wednesday, the House passed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act on a 244-188 vote, with every Republican voting against the legislation. Now the bill moves to the Senate for debate and a potential vote next week. The Senate version of the legislation is not entirely in sync with the House’s version.McClatchy reported last week that the Senate Finance Committee has already “added some provisions desperately sought by corporate America,” such as allowing “some
companies to reduce taxes if they buy down their debt between late 2008 and 2011.” The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups lobbied heavily for the measure.Even with these extra business provisions — which conservatives have complained are absent from the House bill — nine out of 10 Republicans on the Finance Committee voted against the draft. Just few weeks ago, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said that he doesn’t think the economic recovery bill will have “any problem getting over 60 votes.” He also reportedly promised that Senate Republicans “would not filibuster against the stimulus package.” On NPR yesterday, however, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) issued a filibuster threat, saying that the recovery package would need 60 votes to pass. Will McConnell keep his word? Or will conservatives continue to block the economic recovery while advocating a return to Bushonomics?

The Democrats in the Senate have capitulated so much that the Republicans in the Seante expect it to continue. Since the cloture motion to kill a filibuster requires 60 votes, and since we only have 58 at present, then my suggestion is to bring up the nuclear option. Kill the 60 vote rule to overcome fillibuster. Lower it to 51.

,,,,,,

Share

A Second Look: Just Foreign Policy News, January 29, 2009

Just Foreign Policy wrote:

Just Foreign Policy News, January 29, 2009

Iranian President


From: Just Foreign Policy [info@justforeignpolicy.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 4:48 PM
To: Tom Chambless
Subject: Just Foreign Policy News, January 29, 2009
2) Obama Administration officials have drafted a letter to Iran from the president aimed at unfreezing US-Iranian relations and opening the way for face-to-face talks, the Guardian reports. The State Department has been working the letter since Obama was elected. It is in reply to a letter of congratulations sent by the Iranian president. Diplomats said Obama’s letter would be a symbolic gesture to mark a change in tone from the hostile one adopted by the Bush administration. It would be intended to allay suspicions of Iran’s leaders and pave the way for Obama to engage them directly. The draft letter gives assurances the US does not want to overthrow the Iranian government, but merely seeks a change in its behavior.

Finally! The State Department is actually taking part in some diplomacy. Can you belive it? Wow. I hope the ultimate goal is peace, not dominance as was the case the last eight years.

,,,,,

Share

A Second Look: Exxon Mobil Reports Record $45.2 Billion Profit For 2008

via Exxon Mobil Reports Record $45.2 Billion Profit For 2008.

HOUSTON — Exxon Mobil Corp. on Friday reported a profit of $45.2 billion for 2008, breaking its own record for a U.S. company, even as its fourth-quarter earnings fell 33 percent from a year ago.

The previous record for annual profit was $40.6 billion, which the world’s largest publicly traded oil company set in 2007.

The extraordinary full-year profit wasn’t a surprise given crude’s triple-digit price for much of 2008, peaking near an unheard of $150 a barrel in July. Since then, however, prices have fallen roughly 70 percent amid a deepening global economic crisis.

That is world record profits two years running! I wonder what the hourly wage is of their unionized oil rig workers. Let’s see. The name of the union is the Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Union. The oil rig workers make over $100,000 per year. If you apply Republican logic to this, the oil companies must be on the brink of collapse paying their worker such high wages.

From Rigzone.com:

Salaries for the most sought-after categories of oil workers have risen about a third over the past four years, according to Stephen Whittaker of Schlumberger Ltd., the world’s biggest oil-services company by revenue. An experienced “roughneck,” the nickname for rig workers, can make $100,000 a year, and top white-collar engineers can make as much as $500,000 a year, industry analysts and officials said.

But wait! Exxon Mobile is the biggest profiteer in the world! With union wages so high, how can this be?

Maybe the Republicans are wrong about unions. Maybe unions aren’t driving businesses in the ground. Maybe it’s something else.

What if business go under because of mismanagement? Or what if businesses go under because of piss poor prior planning? Or what if businesses go under because of bad investments by the CEOs? What if businesses go under from competition? Do you still think labor unions are the reason behind businesses failure?


Share
You are protected by wp-dephorm: