A Second Look Rotating Header Image

January 30th, 2009:

A Second Look: Wonk Room » Conservatives Beat The Drum For Permanent Corporate Tax Cuts

via Wonk Room » Conservatives Beat The Drum For Permanent Corporate Tax Cuts.

Cutting corporate taxes is a tired conservative solution to just about everything. Remember, it was a centerpiece of Sen. John McCain’s R-AZ presidential campaign, even before the economic crisis hit. But as the Center for American Progress’ Will Straw wrote, permanent corporate tax cuts simply fail to provide stimulus:

The track record for such steps is poor in general, but they are particularly ill-suited for a recessionary period. After all, the reason that businesses and individuals are not investing at the moment has little to do with the taxes they may pay in the future and everything to do with a fear of losing money because there is no demand in the economy, asset prices are highly volatile, and credit is hard to come by.

Citizens for Tax Justice noted that “every dollar lost from cutting the corporate income tax would increase real GDP by just 30 cents.” That’s hardly the sort of stimulative effect that would justify slashing the corporate rate.

Tax cuts didn’t work, neither under Reagan, nor Bush, nor Bush. So the logic here is that more tax cuts will work to stimulate the economy this time?

Share

A Second Look: Shameful Corporate Greed

The Progress Report wrote:

Shameful Corporate Greed

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY)


From: The Progress Report [progress@americanprogressaction.org]
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 9:37 AM
To: tomc2322
Subject: Shameful Corporate Greed
CONGRESS — FLASHBACK: McCONNELL SAID STIMULUS WON’T HAVE ANY PROBLEM ‘GETTING OVER 60 VOTES’: On Wednesday, the House passed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act on a 244-188 vote, with every Republican voting against the legislation. Now the bill moves to the Senate for debate and a potential vote next week. The Senate version of the legislation is not entirely in sync with the House’s version.McClatchy reported last week that the Senate Finance Committee has already “added some provisions desperately sought by corporate America,” such as allowing “some
companies to reduce taxes if they buy down their debt between late 2008 and 2011.” The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups lobbied heavily for the measure.Even with these extra business provisions — which conservatives have complained are absent from the House bill — nine out of 10 Republicans on the Finance Committee voted against the draft. Just few weeks ago, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said that he doesn’t think the economic recovery bill will have “any problem getting over 60 votes.” He also reportedly promised that Senate Republicans “would not filibuster against the stimulus package.” On NPR yesterday, however, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) issued a filibuster threat, saying that the recovery package would need 60 votes to pass. Will McConnell keep his word? Or will conservatives continue to block the economic recovery while advocating a return to Bushonomics?

The Democrats in the Senate have capitulated so much that the Republicans in the Seante expect it to continue. Since the cloture motion to kill a filibuster requires 60 votes, and since we only have 58 at present, then my suggestion is to bring up the nuclear option. Kill the 60 vote rule to overcome fillibuster. Lower it to 51.

,,,,,,

Share

A Second Look: Just Foreign Policy News, January 29, 2009

Just Foreign Policy wrote:

Just Foreign Policy News, January 29, 2009

Iranian President


From: Just Foreign Policy [info@justforeignpolicy.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 4:48 PM
To: Tom Chambless
Subject: Just Foreign Policy News, January 29, 2009
2) Obama Administration officials have drafted a letter to Iran from the president aimed at unfreezing US-Iranian relations and opening the way for face-to-face talks, the Guardian reports. The State Department has been working the letter since Obama was elected. It is in reply to a letter of congratulations sent by the Iranian president. Diplomats said Obama’s letter would be a symbolic gesture to mark a change in tone from the hostile one adopted by the Bush administration. It would be intended to allay suspicions of Iran’s leaders and pave the way for Obama to engage them directly. The draft letter gives assurances the US does not want to overthrow the Iranian government, but merely seeks a change in its behavior.

Finally! The State Department is actually taking part in some diplomacy. Can you belive it? Wow. I hope the ultimate goal is peace, not dominance as was the case the last eight years.

,,,,,

Share
You are protected by wp-dephorm: