A Second Look Rotating Header Image

January 22nd, 2009:

A Second Look: Rep. John Murtha: Gone-tanamo Bay: the Right Decision

via Rep. John Murtha: Gone-tanamo Bay: the Right Decision.

Rep. John Murtha
Posted January 22, 2009 | 12:39 PM (EST)

President Obama took the first key step in restoring America’s image and credibility in the world by issuing an Executive Order to close the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay and to prohibit the use of torture by U.S. personnel.

I applaud his judgment and I wholeheartedly support this decision.

The Bush administration never understood what the Guantanamo detention facility symbolized to the rest of the world. They saw it as simply a prison, and just weeks ago, Dick Cheney commented that he thought “Guantanamo has been very well run.” The problem with Guantanamo was never about its bricks and mortar. The problem with Guantanamo is that its very existence stains and defies the moral fiber of our great nation.

2009-01-22-f2a620480020e8be554b46d9c1109994.jpeg.jpg

President Obama closes Guantanamo Bay Military Prison

Exactly. It may be the most efficient and tightest ran Navy base in the world, but it has become a symbol to the rest of the world of everything that we do not want to be, but were under Bush.

Closing Gitmo will show the world that BHO is the type of leader that understands our position and for what the American flag stands.

Share

A Second Look: Daily Kos: State of the Nation

via Daily Kos: State of the Nation.

Petty Grievances
by Hunter
Thu Jan 22, 2009 at 07:30:03 AM PST

Hunter is ranting against the ever-too-cautious middle-of-the-roaders who want to have their cake and eat it, too. Jim Hightower said that the only thing in the middle of the road is yellow lines and dead armadillos.

Hunter:

This is why I have come, in these recent years, to despise these people. There is no abomination on this earth worth an emotional outburst, in their minds — no conflict worth a raised voice. There is only the mushy, cowardly middle, one that never stands for anything too much or critiques anything too loudly. They all stink like fish, they have been praising the status quo for so long and so colorlessly — and yet they fancy themselves intellectuals for it, and even presume themselves courageous for it.

Amen. I am not your flaming lefty loony, or on second thought maybe I am, but Hunter is speaking here for me, for my sense of right from wrong that has been rubbed raw the last twenty some-odd years since Reagan.

I thank him and I want to add that there is really no such thing as “the center” or the “middle”. Everyone has opinions about the issues, on some they are left leaning, some right. Hunters reflections are how I feel.

But the bigger question here is this; can we come together in this new era of Obama on fundamentals like a women’s reproductive choices without being so personally insulted that we cannot reach a compromise?

Can we support the kind of politics that Obama is preaching? If we believe in our hearts on hot-button issues like abortion that we are right, can we swallow some of that anger and reach our hand out to shake the right-wing’s hand in compromise? We say that Bush broke the law by illegally wiretapping and they, the neo-nut-jobs say that what he did was done out of sincere concern for safety and Congress agreed.

They, the right-wing, are on the wrong side of this and many issues but to them, we are the ones on the wrong side and yet we are all proud and patriotic citizens.

Obama spoke of dictators saying:

To those who cling to power through corruption and deceit and the silencing of dissent, know that you are on the wrong side of history, but that we will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist.

But that statement applies also to the Bush administration and the Karl Rove philosophy of the continual campaign. Can we reach out to them?

I think that if we took the lead and reached across the isle first, maybe something good might stir up from it. We can still have our deep feelings, and they can still have theirs, but it has become painfully clear that it is necessary for us to move toward each other and to see that we are more alike than we realize. Our President is trying to inspire us to do just that.

And yet at this moment, a moment that will define a generation, it is precisely this spirit [a willingness to find meaning in something greater than themselves] that must inhabit us all.  For as much as government can do, and must do, it is ultimately the faith and determination of the American people upon which this nation relies.  It is the kindness to take in a stranger when the levees break, the selflessness of workers who would rather cut their hours than see a friend lose their job which sees us through our darkest hours.  It is the firefighter’s courage to storm a stairway filled with smoke, but also a parent’s willingness to nurture a child that finally decides our fate.

Change has come

So we can rail against the right and even against the middle, but eventually we must realize that there is only two directions for us. We can travel together with those who offer different opinions in order to make this union whole again, or we can continue to be more and more divided.

The President is right. It is not he who brings change to this country. It’s us.

Share

A Second Look: Obama’s Second Day To Focus On Foreign Affairs

via Obama’s Second Day To Focus On Foreign Affairs.

PHILIP ELLIOTT | January 22, 2009 09:07 AM EST | AP

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is ready to trumpet Hillary Rodham Clinton’s installation as secretary of state while turning to veteran politician and dealmaker George Mitchell to guide the new administration through the Mideast thicket.

It amounts to a new-look U.S. foreign policy by four senators _ Obama and Clinton and Vice President Joe Biden, who served together until after this year’s election, and Mitchell, who served much earlier as Senate majority leader. Obama was going to the State Department Thursday to join Clinton in addressing diplomats there and _ very likely _ setting forth major elements of the administration’s emerging national security strategy.

President Obama signs Nomination Orders

One key aspect of that policy would move forward Thursday, with Obama planning to sign an order to shutter the much-maligned Guantanamo prison within a year, according to a senior administration official. This would redeem a promise that Obama frequently made on the campaign trail.

If it seems that we are all breathlessly awaiting more news from the White House it’s because we are. Day 2 is here and we are examining BHO’s every move. We are all hanging on his every word. I’m glad we have some adult leadership in the White House, finally. Shutting Gitmo would be a symbol of our nations intent. We need to send that signal.

If you were looking around for someone to be a special envoy to the ME, and there was George Mitchell, believe me, you could do worse. From The Jerusalem Post, January 22, 2009, Herb Keinon quotes Mitchell:

Mitchell, Washington’s special envoy to the

Northern Ireland peace negotiations that led to the Belfast Agreement in 1998, spoke to the Post during a visit here last month to take part in a conference on US-Israeli relations at Tel Aviv University’s Institute for National Security Studies (INSS).

“I understand the people in the

Middle East are discouraged,” Mitchell said. “I understand your feelings. But from my experience in

Northern Ireland
, I share the feeling that there is no such thing as a conflict that can’t be ended. Conflicts are created by human beings, and can be ended by human beings. It may take a long time. But with committed, active and strong leadership, it can happen here in the

Middle East
.”

This is a complete reversal of Bush’s policy of “Israel has a right to defend herself”, meaning that the U.S. will take a hands-off approach to any aggression by Israel. War by Israel is appropriate to the neo-cons because it will hurry the end of the world or something just as stupid. It never ceases to amaze me how many life and death decisions Bush made, not out of a deep concern for what was right, but out of pure ideology.

Share
You are protected by wp-dephorm: