The Progress Report wrote:
The Bush Legacy Propaganda
From: The Progress Report [progress@americanprogressaction.org]Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 9:25 AM
Subject: The Bush Legacy Propaganda
ADMINISTRATION
The Bush Legacy Propaganda
President Bush repeatedly argues that neither he nor his contemporaries are yet able to fully assess his legacy. Rather, he and his advisers say — again and again and again — that “history will judge” whether he was an effective president. Despite this oft-repeated claim, the President seems disinclined to leave any of his legacy to chance. In recent weeks, he and his advisers have offered assessments of the Bush era that are increasingly at odds with reality. Condoleezza Rice, for example, argued that Bush engaged the United Nations more than any other president. And just yesterday, Bush told a crowd that Donald Rumsfeld did an “outstanding job” as Secretary of Defense. In a similar vein, the White House recently released a report entitled, “Highlights of Accomplishments and Results of the Administration of George W. Bush” that featured a list of “100 Things Americans May Not Know About the Bush Administration Record.” As Frank Rich wrote for the New York Times, “This document is the literary correlative to ‘Mission Accomplished.’” As Rich notes, much of the legacy report’s claims about the Bush administration’s economic, social, and international accomplishments are only true under very narrow conditions, suggesting that the President hopes that Americans would blind themselves to the broader failures of his presidency.
The entire eight year reign of George W. Bush has been a lie, so why stop now. If someone, like a preacher for example, has to preach to me every Sunday to convince me of what is right, then I have to throw up a flag or two to tell me to watch out, someone is lying.
Likewise, if a politician has to preach to me over and over that something is so, then he is trying to sell a lie. As Katie Couric said in her now famous interview with Sarah Palin, “not to belabor the point” but I’ve really got to ask the question one more time.
Republican neo-conservatism has failed. Republicanism has beed given the pink slip. Elections have consequenses. The right-wing, neo-nutjob, trickle-down, breaks-for-billionairs, bad governance, turn-the-back-to-crime, philosophy of government is DEAD, DEAD, DEAD! So why is anyone listening to them?
